205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26273376)
1. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Mao T; Fang W; Gu Z; Guo X; Ji C; Chen W
Thorac Cancer; 2015 May; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 26273376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Shibutani M; Yamazoe S; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K
Anticancer Res; 2014 May; 34(5):2399-404. PubMed ID: 24778050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative study of perioperative complications and lymphadenectomy between minimally invasive esophagectomy and open procedure].
Mao T; Fang WT; Gu ZT; Yao F; Guo XF; Chen WH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 15(9):922-5. PubMed ID: 22990924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.
Guo W; Ma X; Yang S; Zhu X; Qin W; Xiang J; Lerut T; Li H
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3873-81. PubMed ID: 26659248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.
Zingg U; McQuinn A; DiValentino D; Esterman AJ; Bessell JR; Thompson SK; Jamieson GG; Watson DI
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 87(3):911-9. PubMed ID: 19231418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent advances in thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Booka E; Takeuchi H; Kikuchi H; Hiramatsu Y; Kamiya K; Kawakubo H; Kitagawa Y
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2019 Jan; 12(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 30590876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Is it truly less invasive?
Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda Y; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2019 Mar; 3(2):138-145. PubMed ID: 30923783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical application of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma].
Liu SY; Wang F; Zheng QF; Chen XF
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 15(9):947-9. PubMed ID: 22990930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Zhai C; Liu Y; Li W; Xu T; Yang G; Lu H; Hu D
J Thorac Dis; 2015 Dec; 7(12):2352-8. PubMed ID: 26793358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review.
Koyanagi K; Ozawa S; Tachimori Y
Surg Today; 2016 Mar; 46(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25860592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.
Zhao Y; Jiao W; Zhao J; Wang X; Luo Y; Wang Y
Indian J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51 Suppl 2():e25-8. PubMed ID: 25712837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study.
Mamidanna R; Bottle A; Aylin P; Faiz O; Hanna GB
Ann Surg; 2012 Feb; 255(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22173202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.
Sihag S; Kosinski AS; Gaissert HA; Wright CD; Schipper PH
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. PubMed ID: 26704412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy on Circulating Tumor Cell Level in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer.
Wang HB; Guo Q; Li YH; Sun ZQ; Li TT; Zhang WX; Xiang SS; Li HF
World J Surg; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1655-62. PubMed ID: 27020921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Lv L; Hu W; Ren Y; Wei X
Onco Targets Ther; 2016; 9():6751-6762. PubMed ID: 27826201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of the introduction of a minimally invasive esophagectomy program in a tertiary referral center.
Blom RL; Klinkenbijl JH; Hollmann MW; Bergman JJ; Cuesta MA; Bemelman WA; Busch OR; van Berge Henegouwen MI
J Thorac Dis; 2012 Oct; 4(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 23050110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe in patients with previous gastric bypass.
Rossidis G; Browning R; Hochwald SN; Abbas H; Kim T; Ben-David K
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2014; 10(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 23791535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer.
Meng F; Li Y; Ma H; Yan M; Zhang R
J Thorac Dis; 2014 Sep; 6(9):1218-24. PubMed ID: 25276363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
