BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26273615)

  • 21. Postoperative stability following maxillary downward movement with Le Fort I inclined osteotomy at the lateral nasal cavity wall.
    Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):793-8. PubMed ID: 22429608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomies on velopharyngeal and speech functions in cleft patients.
    Janulewicz J; Costello BJ; Buckley MJ; Ford MD; Close J; Gassner R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 62(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 15015163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of maxillary advancement on speech and velopharyngeal function in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Smedberg E; Neovius E; Lohmander A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 May; 51(3):334-43. PubMed ID: 24024957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Postoperative skeletal stability and accuracy of a new combined Le Fort I and horseshoe osteotomy for superior repositioning of the maxilla.
    Yoshioka I; Khanal A; Kodama M; Furuta N; Tominaga K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1250-5. PubMed ID: 19664907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A pilot study of the effects of transpalatal maxillary advancement on velopharyngeal closure in cleft palate patients.
    Sell D; Ma L; James D; Mars M; Sheriff M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 30(6):349-54. PubMed ID: 12425989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients.
    Meazzini MC; Basile V; Mazzoleni F; Bozzetti A; Brusati R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jan; 68(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 25287581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pharyngeal airway space changes and stability following an extended LeFort-I osteotomy advancement in cleft lip and palate and non-cleft lip and palate patients: A long term comparison study.
    Tekin U; Akdeniz BS; Keller EE
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 123(2):121-127. PubMed ID: 34157445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate--a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Chua HD; Cheung LK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 21958662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Internal maxillary distraction with a new bimalar device.
    Kahn DM; Broujerdi J; Schendel SA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 66(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 18355590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients.
    Mehra P; Wolford LM; Hopkin JK; Castro V; Frietas R
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 12387610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is Linear Advancement Related to Relapse in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Orthognathic Surgery?
    Watts GD; Antonarakis GS; Forrest CR; Tompson BD; Phillips JH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):717-23. PubMed ID: 25259777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single versus segmental maxillary osteotomies and long-term stability in unilateral cleft lip and palate related malocclusion.
    Watts GD; Antonarakis GS; Forrest CR; Tompson BD; Phillips JH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 72(12):2514-21. PubMed ID: 25262403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An Alternative Internal Le Fort I Distractor: Early Results With a New Trans-Nasal Device.
    Lypka M; Hendricks H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 31(4):1125-1128. PubMed ID: 32118665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Horizontal Maxillary Osteotomy Stability Using Mandibular Outer Cortex Bone Grafts in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Zheng Y; Yin N; Jiang C; Song T
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 29(7):1747-1750. PubMed ID: 30028400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Midfacial volumetric and upper lip soft tissue changes after Le Fort I advancement of the cleft maxilla.
    Susarla SM; Berli JU; Kumar A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):708-18. PubMed ID: 25649014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Skeletal stability of maxillary advancement with and without a mandibular reduction in the cleft lip and palate patient.
    Wong FX; Heggie AA; Shand JM; Schneider PM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 45(12):1501-1507. PubMed ID: 27575393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Skeletal stability and relapse patterns after Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy fixed with miniplates: the unilateral cleft lip and palate deformity.
    Posnick JC; Dagys AP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Dec; 94(7):924-32. PubMed ID: 7972480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
    He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cephalometric changes in nasopharyngeal area after anterior maxillary segmental distraction versus Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.
    Tahmasbi S; Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Pourdanesh F; Behnaz M
    Eur J Dent; 2018; 12(3):393-397. PubMed ID: 30147405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endoscopically assisted intraoral modified Le Fort II type midfacial advancement using piezoelectric surgery and an intraoperative RED system.
    Hara S; Mitsugi M; Kanno T; Nomachi A; Kawakami S; Tatemoto Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e93-103. PubMed ID: 23351774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.