These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26273633)

  • 1. Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition for Genetic Interaction Data.
    Wang Y; Yang D; Deng M
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():573956. PubMed ID: 26273633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modular analysis of the probabilistic genetic interaction network.
    Hou L; Wang L; Qian M; Li D; Tang C; Zhu Y; Deng M; Li F
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 27(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 21278184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputing missing values for genetic interaction data.
    Wang Y; Wang L; Yang D; Deng M
    Methods; 2014 Jun; 67(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 24718098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of Links Between Cellular Pathways by Genetic Interaction Mapping (GIM).
    Malabat C; Saveanu C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1361():325-43. PubMed ID: 26483030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating gene regulatory networks and protein-protein interactions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from multiple genome-wide data.
    Nariai N; Tamada Y; Imoto S; Miyano S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():ii206-12. PubMed ID: 16204105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative genetic analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using epistatic miniarray profiles (E-MAPs) and its application to chromatin functions.
    Schuldiner M; Collins SR; Weissman JS; Krogan NJ
    Methods; 2006 Dec; 40(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 17101447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrahigh-Density Screens for Genome-Wide Yeast EMAPs in a Single Plate.
    Licon K; Shen JP; Munson BP; Michaca M; Fassino C; Fassino L; Kreisberg JF; Ideker T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2049():73-85. PubMed ID: 31602605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving residue-residue contact prediction via low-rank and sparse decomposition of residue correlation matrix.
    Zhang H; Gao Y; Deng M; Wang C; Zhu J; Li SC; Zheng WM; Bu D
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Mar; 472(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 26920058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalent positive epistasis in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic networks.
    He X; Qian W; Wang Z; Li Y; Zhang J
    Nat Genet; 2010 Mar; 42(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 20101242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In search of the biological significance of modular structures in protein networks.
    Wang Z; Zhang J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Jun; 3(6):e107. PubMed ID: 17542644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Local coherence in genetic interaction patterns reveals prevalent functional versatility.
    Pu S; Ronen K; Vlasblom J; Greenblatt J; Wodak SJ
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2376-83. PubMed ID: 18718945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks.
    Kelley R; Ideker T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 May; 23(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 15877074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast.
    Boone C; Bussey H; Andrews BJ
    Nat Rev Genet; 2007 Jun; 8(6):437-49. PubMed ID: 17510664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting genetic regulatory response using classification.
    Middendorf M; Kundaje A; Wiggins C; Freund Y; Leslie C
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i232-40. PubMed ID: 15262804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imputing and predicting quantitative genetic interactions in epistatic MAPs.
    Ryan C; Cagney G; Krogan N; Cunningham P; Greene D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 781():353-61. PubMed ID: 21877290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data Imputation in Epistatic MAPs by Network-Guided Matrix Completion.
    Žitnik M; Zupan B
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):595-608. PubMed ID: 25658751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modularized learning of genetic interaction networks from biological annotations and mRNA expression data.
    Lee PH; Lee D
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2739-47. PubMed ID: 15797909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein-protein interaction network.
    Chen J; Yuan B
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2283-90. PubMed ID: 16837529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finding friends and enemies in an enemies-only network: a graph diffusion kernel for predicting novel genetic interactions and co-complex membership from yeast genetic interactions.
    Qi Y; Suhail Y; Lin YY; Boeke JD; Bader JS
    Genome Res; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1991-2004. PubMed ID: 18832443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensionality reduction by UMAP to visualize physical and genetic interactions.
    Dorrity MW; Saunders LM; Queitsch C; Fields S; Trapnell C
    Nat Commun; 2020 Mar; 11(1):1537. PubMed ID: 32210240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.