These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26273633)

  • 41. Homogeneous decomposition of protein interaction networks: refining the description of intra-modular interactions.
    Del Mondo G; Eveillard D; Rusu I
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 25(7):926-32. PubMed ID: 19223451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A fast hierarchical clustering algorithm for functional modules discovery in protein interaction networks.
    Wang J; Li M; Chen J; Pan Y
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(3):607-20. PubMed ID: 20733244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On the Mapping of Epistatic Genetic Interactions in Natural Isolates: Combining Classical Genetics and Genomics.
    Hou J; Schacherer J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1361():345-60. PubMed ID: 26483031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. AVID: an integrative framework for discovering functional relationships among proteins.
    Jiang T; Keating AE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 6():136. PubMed ID: 15929793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Discerning static and causal interactions in genome-wide reverse engineering problems.
    Zampieri M; Soranzo N; Altafini C
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 24(13):1510-5. PubMed ID: 18467346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fast and accurate method for identifying high-quality protein-interaction modules by clique merging and its application to yeast.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhou Y
    J Proteome Res; 2006 Apr; 5(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 16602686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An E-MAP of the ER.
    Conibear E
    Cell; 2005 Nov; 123(3):366-8. PubMed ID: 16269327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci.
    Laurie C; Wang S; Carlini-Garcia LA; Zeng ZB
    BMC Genet; 2014 Nov; 15():112. PubMed ID: 25367219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of degree correlations on network structure and stability in protein-protein interaction networks.
    Friedel CC; Zimmer R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():297. PubMed ID: 17688687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Quantitative maps of genetic interactions in yeast - comparative evaluation and integrative analysis.
    Lindén RO; Eronen VP; Aittokallio T
    BMC Syst Biol; 2011 Mar; 5():45. PubMed ID: 21435228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The importance of age and high degree, in protein-protein interaction networks.
    Rito T; Deane CM; Reinert G
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):785-95. PubMed ID: 22697248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Predicting interactions in protein networks by completing defective cliques.
    Yu H; Paccanaro A; Trifonov V; Gerstein M
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(7):823-9. PubMed ID: 16455753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Putting genetic interactions in context through a global modular decomposition.
    Bellay J; Atluri G; Sing TL; Toufighi K; Costanzo M; Ribeiro PS; Pandey G; Baller J; VanderSluis B; Michaut M; Han S; Kim P; Brown GW; Andrews BJ; Boone C; Kumar V; Myers CL
    Genome Res; 2011 Aug; 21(8):1375-87. PubMed ID: 21715556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A quantitative analysis of monochromaticity in genetic interaction networks.
    Hsu CH; Wang TY; Chu HT; Kao CY; Chen KC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011; 12 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S16. PubMed ID: 22372977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Genetic interaction networks mediate individual statin drug response in
    Busby BP; Niktab E; Roberts CA; Sheridan JP; Coorey NV; Senanayake DS; Connor LM; Munkacsi AB; Atkinson PH
    NPJ Syst Biol Appl; 2019; 5():35. PubMed ID: 31602312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison and evaluation of network clustering algorithms applied to genetic interaction networks.
    Hou L; Wang L; Berg A; Qian M; Zhu Y; Li F; Deng M
    Front Biosci (Elite Ed); 2012 Jan; 4(6):2150-61. PubMed ID: 22202027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Genome evolution predicts genetic interactions in protein complexes and reveals cancer drug targets.
    Lu X; Kensche PR; Huynen MA; Notebaart RA
    Nat Commun; 2013; 4():2124. PubMed ID: 23851603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The interplay between chromosome stability and cell cycle control explored through gene-gene interaction and computational simulation.
    Frumkin JP; Patra BN; Sevold A; Ganguly K; Patel C; Yoon S; Schmid MB; Ray A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Sep; 44(17):8073-85. PubMed ID: 27530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A systems-biology approach to modular genetic complexity.
    Carter GW; Rush CG; Uygun F; Sakhanenko NA; Galas DJ; Galitski T
    Chaos; 2010 Jun; 20(2):026102. PubMed ID: 20590331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detection of gene-gene interactions using multistage sparse and low-rank regression.
    Hung H; Lin YT; Chen P; Wang CC; Huang SY; Tzeng JY
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 26288029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.