These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26275668)

  • 1. Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure.
    Milt AW; Gagnolet T; Armsworth PR
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 26275668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs of avoiding environmental impacts from shale-gas surface infrastructure.
    Milt AW; Gagnolet TD; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Dec; 30(6):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 27232111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linear infrastructure drives habitat conversion and forest fragmentation associated with Marcellus shale gas development in a forested landscape.
    Langlois LA; Drohan PJ; Brittingham MC
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():167-176. PubMed ID: 28371760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A framework to predict the impacts of shale gas infrastructures on the forest fragmentation of an agroforest region.
    Racicot A; Babin-Roussel V; Dauphinais JF; Joly JS; Noël P; Lavoie C
    Environ Manage; 2014 May; 53(5):1023-33. PubMed ID: 24554146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of shale gas development on water resources: a case study in northern poland.
    Vandecasteele I; Marí Rivero I; Sala S; Baranzelli C; Barranco R; Batelaan O; Lavalle C
    Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1285-99. PubMed ID: 25877457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early trends in landcover change and forest fragmentation due to shale-gas development in Pennsylvania: a potential outcome for the Northcentral Appalachians.
    Drohan PJ; Brittingham M; Bishop J; Yoder K
    Environ Manage; 2012 May; 49(5):1061-75. PubMed ID: 22447181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecological risks of shale oil and gas development to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats.
    Brittingham MC; Maloney KO; Farag AM; Harper DD; Bowen ZH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11034-47. PubMed ID: 25188826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Habitat loss and modification due to gas development in the Fayetteville shale.
    Moran MD; Cox AB; Wells RL; Benichou CC; McClung MR
    Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1276-84. PubMed ID: 25566834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Improved Approach for Forecasting Ecological Impacts from Future Drilling in Unconventional Shale Oil and Gas Plays.
    Wolaver BD; Pierre JP; Ikonnikova SA; Andrews JR; McDaid G; Ryberg WA; Hibbitts TJ; Duran CM; Labay BJ; LaDuc TJ
    Environ Manage; 2018 Aug; 62(2):323-333. PubMed ID: 29654362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing changes in groundwater chemistry in landscapes with more than 100 years of oil and gas development.
    Wen T; Agarwal A; Xue L; Chen A; Herman A; Li Z; Brantley SL
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Feb; 21(2):384-396. PubMed ID: 30608109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hydraulic "fracking": are surface water impacts an ecological concern?
    Burton GA; Basu N; Ellis BR; Kapo KE; Entrekin S; Nadelhoffer K
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1679-89. PubMed ID: 25044053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Searching for anomalous methane in shallow groundwater near shale gas wells.
    Li Z; You C; Gonzales M; Wendt AK; Wu F; Brantley SL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Dec; 195():23-30. PubMed ID: 27875753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drinking water while fracking: now and in the future.
    Brantley SL
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 25713828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring concentration and isotopic composition of methane in groundwater in the Utica Shale hydraulic fracturing region of Ohio.
    Claire Botner E; Townsend-Small A; Nash DB; Xu X; Schimmelmann A; Miller JH
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 May; 190(6):322. PubMed ID: 29721622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pennsylvania's technologically enhanced, naturally occurring radioactive material experiences and studies of the oil and gas industry.
    Allard DJ
    Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):178. PubMed ID: 25551500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marcellus and mercury: Assessing potential impacts of unconventional natural gas extraction on aquatic ecosystems in northwestern Pennsylvania.
    Grant CJ; Weimer AB; Marks NK; Perow ES; Oster JM; Brubaker KM; Trexler RV; Solomon CM; Lamendella R
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2015; 50(5):482-500. PubMed ID: 25734824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of shale gas development on core forests in the subtropical karst region in southwestern China.
    Guo Y; Du X; Chen H; Zheng G; Zhang X; Wang Q
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 771():145287. PubMed ID: 33540159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematically Incorporating Environmental Objectives into Shale Gas Pipeline Development: A Binary Integer, Multiobjective Spatial Optimization Model.
    Kroetz K; Shih JS; Siikamäki JV; Marianov V; Krupnick A; Chu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jun; 53(12):7155-7162. PubMed ID: 31050415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolving shale gas management: water resource risks, impacts, and lessons learned.
    Rahm BG; Riha SJ
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(6):1400-12. PubMed ID: 24664241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oil and gas wells and pipelines on U.S. wildlife refuges: challenges for managers.
    Ramirez P; Mosley SB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124085. PubMed ID: 25915417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.