These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26276365)

  • 1. Sustained Attention in Auditory and Visual Monitoring Tasks: Evaluation of the Administration of a Rest Break or Exogenous Vibrotactile Signals.
    Arrabito GR; Ho G; Aghaei B; Burns C; Hou M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1403-16. PubMed ID: 26276365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of task demands on tactile vigilance.
    DeLucia PR; Greenlee ET
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Feb; 241(2):441-449. PubMed ID: 36576508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tactile Vigilance Is Stressful and Demanding.
    DeLucia PR; Greenlee ET
    Hum Factors; 2022 Jun; 64(4):732-745. PubMed ID: 33090041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 'I need a break': the effect of choice of rest break duration on vigilance.
    Waldfogle GE; Garibaldi AE; Neigel AR; Szalma JL
    Ergonomics; 2021 Dec; 64(12):1509-1521. PubMed ID: 34328396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effects of Varying Break Length on Attention and Time on Task.
    Lim J; Kwok K
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):472-81. PubMed ID: 26715686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory vigilance task performance and cerebral hemodynamics: effects of spatial uncertainty.
    Hess LJ; Greenlee ET
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jul; 242(7):1787-1795. PubMed ID: 38822826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention, not mindlessness.
    Grier RA; Warm JS; Dember WN; Matthews G; Galinsky TL; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 14702988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rest improves performance, nature improves happiness: Assessment of break periods on the abbreviated vigilance task.
    Finkbeiner KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():277-285. PubMed ID: 27089530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention.
    Szalma JL; Warm JS; Matthews G; Dember WN; Weiler EM; Meier A; Eggemeier FT
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(2):219-33. PubMed ID: 15359672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of EEG workload indices for diagnostic monitoring of vigilance decrement.
    Kamzanova AT; Kustubayeva AM; Matthews G
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1136-49. PubMed ID: 25277022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Viewing the workload of vigilance through the lenses of the NASA-TLX and the MRQ.
    Finomore VS; Shaw TH; Warm JS; Matthews G; Boles DB
    Hum Factors; 2013 Dec; 55(6):1044-63. PubMed ID: 24745198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality.
    Lu SA; Wickens CD; Prinet JC; Hutchins SD; Sarter N; Sebok A
    Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):697-724. PubMed ID: 23964412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vigilance to Spatialized Auditory Displays: Initial Assessment of Performance and Workload.
    Greenlee ET; Hess LJ; Simpson BD; Finomore VS
    Hum Factors; 2024 Apr; 66(4):987-1003. PubMed ID: 36455164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disrupting monotony while increasing demand: benefits of rest and intervening tasks on vigilance.
    Ralph BC; Onderwater K; Thomson DR; Smilek D
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):432-444. PubMed ID: 26895452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Good vibrations: human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality.
    Jones LA; Poliakoff E; Wells J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2171-86. PubMed ID: 19370453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interruption management: the use of attention-directing tactile cues.
    Hopp PJ; Smith CA; Clegg BA; Heggestad ED
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15960083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of visual and vibrotactile feedback methods for seated posture guidance.
    Zheng YJ; Morrell JB
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 24808264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isolating the neural mechanisms of interference during continuous multisensory dual-task performance.
    Kasper RW; Cecotti H; Touryan J; Eckstein MP; Giesbrecht B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 24047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG-based detection of modality-specific visual and auditory sensory processing.
    Massaeli F; Bagheri M; Power SD
    J Neural Eng; 2023 Feb; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36749989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex differences in vigilance performance and perceived workload.
    Dittmar ML; Warm JS; Dember WN; Ricks DF
    J Gen Psychol; 1993 Jul; 120(3):309-22. PubMed ID: 8138796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.