236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2627674)
21. Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 1: A unified theory of carcinogenicity based on contemporary knowledge.
Wolf DC; Cohen SM; Boobis AR; Dellarco VL; Fenner-Crisp PA; Moretto A; Pastoor TP; Schoeny RS; Seed JG; Doe JE
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Apr; 103():86-92. PubMed ID: 30634023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.
Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D
Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. How well can in vitro data predict in vivo effects of chemicals? Rodent carcinogenicity as a case study.
Anthony Tony Cox L; Popken DA; Kaplan AM; Plunkett LM; Becker RA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():54-64. PubMed ID: 26879462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
Vainio H; Hemminki K
J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prevalence of genotoxic chemicals among animal and human carcinogens evaluated in the IARC Monograph Series.
Bartsch H; Malaveille C
Cell Biol Toxicol; 1989 Jun; 5(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 2766027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Chemically induced renal tubule tumors in the laboratory rat and mouse: review of the NCI/NTP database and categorization of renal carcinogens based on mechanistic information.
Lock EA; Hard GC
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2004; 34(3):211-99. PubMed ID: 15239388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of short-term tests in determining the genotoxicity or nongenotoxicity of chemicals.
Ashby J
IARC Sci Publ; 1992; (116):135-64. PubMed ID: 1428079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay: review of the methods and results.
Mauthe RJ; Gibson DP; Bunch RT; Custer L
Toxicol Pathol; 2001; 29 Suppl():138-46. PubMed ID: 11695550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The pH 6.7 Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay for assessing the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
LeBoeuf RA; Kerckaert GA; Aardema MJ; Gibson DP; Brauninger R; Isfort RJ
Mutat Res; 1996 Sep; 356(1):85-127. PubMed ID: 8841476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 2: Current knowledge of carcinogenesis shows that categorization as a carcinogen or non-carcinogen is not scientifically credible.
Doe JE; Boobis AR; Dellarco V; Fenner-Crisp PA; Moretto A; Pastoor TP; Schoeny RS; Seed JG; Wolf DC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Apr; 103():124-129. PubMed ID: 30660801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Active cell death (apoptosis) and cellular proliferation as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Schulte-Hermann R; Bursch W; Marian B; Grasl-Kraupp B
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):273-85. PubMed ID: 10353391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Environmental and chemical carcinogenesis.
Wogan GN; Hecht SS; Felton JS; Conney AH; Loeb LA
Semin Cancer Biol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):473-86. PubMed ID: 15489140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Heritable and cancer risks of exposures to anticancer drugs: inter-species comparisons of covalent deoxyribonucleic acid-binding agents.
Vogel EW; Barbin A; Nivard MJ; Stack HF; Waters MD; Lohman PH
Mutat Res; 1998 May; 400(1-2):509-40. PubMed ID: 9685708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Non-genotoxic factors in the carcinogenetic process: problems of detection and hazard evaluation.
Parodi S; Malacarne D; Taningher M
Toxicol Lett; 1992 Dec; 64-65 Spec No():621-30. PubMed ID: 1471216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The distinct health risk analyses required for genotoxic carcinogens and promoting agents.
Weisburger JH; Williams GM
Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Apr; 50():233-45. PubMed ID: 6873017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens.
Ames BN; Gold LS
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1990 Oct; 87(19):7772-6. PubMed ID: 2217209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In Vitro-In Vivo Carcinogenicity.
Steinberg P
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2017; 157():81-96. PubMed ID: 27506831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Epigenetic events during the process of cell transformation induced by carcinogens (review).
Nguyen-Ba G; Vasseur P
Oncol Rep; 1999; 6(4):925-32. PubMed ID: 10373683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
