416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26277303)
1. Nerve-sparing Surgery Technique, Not the Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles, Leads to Improved Long-term Continence Rates After Radical Prostatectomy.
Michl U; Tennstedt P; Feldmeier L; Mandel P; Oh SJ; Ahyai S; Budäus L; Chun FKH; Haese A; Heinzer H; Salomon G; Schlomm T; Steuber T; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 26277303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.
Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Reeves F; Preece P; Kapoor J; Everaerts W; Murphy DG; Corcoran NM; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):692-704. PubMed ID: 25454614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Urinary Incontinence and Sexual Function After the Introduction of NeuroSAFE in Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.
van der Slot MA; Remmers S; van Leenders GJLH; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; den Bakker MA; Kweldam CF; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ; Venderbos LDF;
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Sep; 9(5):824-831. PubMed ID: 37032279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The role of waterjet dissection in improving erectile function and continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy].
Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Rapoport LM; Grigorev NA; Bezrukov EA; Tsarichenko DG; Sirota ES; Martirosyan GA
Urologiia; 2017 Apr; (1):43-49. PubMed ID: 28394522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence.
Porpiglia F; Bertolo R; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Checcucci E; Morra I; Passera R; Fiori C
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 26297603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective assessment of patient reported urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.
Wei JT; Dunn RL; Marcovich R; Montie JE; Sanda MG
J Urol; 2000 Sep; 164(3 Pt 1):744-8. PubMed ID: 10953138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there any difference in urinary continence between bilateral and unilateral nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiang P; Du Z; Guan D; Yan W; Wang M; Guo D; Liu D; Liu Y; Ping H
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 22(1):66. PubMed ID: 38395861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy.
Schlomm T; Heinzer H; Steuber T; Salomon G; Engel O; Michl U; Haese A; Graefen M; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):320-9. PubMed ID: 21458913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Oncological Outcomes and Data Quality in Studies Assessing Nerve-sparing Versus Non-Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Moris L; Gandaglia G; Vilaseca A; Van den Broeck T; Briers E; De Santis M; Gillessen S; Grivas N; O'Hanlon S; Henry A; Lam TB; Lardas M; Mason M; Oprea-Lager D; Ploussard G; Rouviere O; Schoots IG; van der Poel H; Wiegel T; Willemse PP; Yuan CY; Grummet JP; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; Cornford P; Mottet N
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 May; 8(3):690-700. PubMed ID: 34147405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Srivastava A; Chopra S; Pham A; Sooriakumaran P; Durand M; Chughtai B; Gruschow S; Peyser A; Harneja N; Leung R; Lee R; Herman M; Robinson B; Shevchuk M; Tewari A
Eur Urol; 2013 Mar; 63(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 22901982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nerve-sparing surgery significantly affects long-term continence after radical prostatectomy.
Nandipati KC; Raina R; Agarwal A; Zippe CD
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1127-30. PubMed ID: 18158032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
Suardi N; Moschini M; Gallina A; Gandaglia G; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Salonia A; Hedlund P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does a nerve-sparing technique or potency affect continence after open radical retropubic prostatectomy?
Marien TP; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1581-4. PubMed ID: 18808410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Sivaraman A; Palmer KJ; Coughlin G; Patel VR
Eur Urol; 2011 Jan; 59(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 20801579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified Apical Dissection and Lateral Prostatic Fascia Preservation Improves Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Propensity Score-matched Analysis.
Covas Moschovas M; Bhat S; Onol FF; Rogers T; Roof S; Mazzone E; Mottrie A; Patel V
Eur Urol; 2020 Dec; 78(6):875-884. PubMed ID: 32593529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.
Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor administration increases the rate of urinary continence recovery after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
Gandaglia G; Albersen M; Suardi N; Gallina A; Abdollah F; Castiglione F; Capitanio U; Salonia A; Rigatti P; Hedlund P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Int J Urol; 2013 Apr; 20(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 22970988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
