705 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26278620)
21. The effect of Teflon coating on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic archwires.
Farronato G; Maijer R; Carìa MP; Esposito L; Alberzoni D; Cacciatore G
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 21478301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surface characteristics of retrieved coated and nickel-titanium orthodontic archwires.
Zegan G; Sodor A; Munteanu C
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2012; 53(4):935-9. PubMed ID: 23303016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ex vivo surface and mechanical properties of coated orthodontic archwires.
Elayyan F; Silikas N; Bearn D
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 19011166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations.
Varma DP; Chidambaram S; Reddy KB; Vijay M; Ravindranath D; Prasad MR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlation between frictional force and surface roughness of orthodontic archwires.
Choi S; Hwang EY; Park HK; Park YG
Scanning; 2015; 37(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 26018223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.
Leite VV; Lopes MB; Gonini Júnior A; Almeida MR; Moura SK; Almeida RR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultrastructural effect of self-ligating bracket materials on stainless steel and superelastic NiTi wire surfaces.
Choi S; Lee S; Cheong Y; Park KH; Park HK; Park YG
Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Aug; 75(8):1076-83. PubMed ID: 22419658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of self-ligating brackets on the surfaces of stainless steel wires following clinical use: AFM investigation.
Choi S; Joo HJ; Cheong Y; Park YG; Park HK
J Microsc; 2012 Apr; 246(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22188518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of bracket-slot design on the forces released by superelastic nickel-titanium alignment wires in different deflection configurations.
Nucera R; Gatto E; Borsellino C; Aceto P; Fabiano F; Matarese G; Perillo L; Cordasco G
Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 24067050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tribological behaviour of orthodontic archwires under dry and wet sliding conditions in-vitro. II--Wear patterns.
Berradja A; Willems G; Celis JP
Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 16792242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.
Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 12226612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Antimicrobial effect, frictional resistance, and surface roughness of stainless steel orthodontic brackets coated with nanofilms of silver and titanium oxide: a preliminary study.
Ghasemi T; Arash V; Rabiee SM; Rajabnia R; Pourzare A; Rakhshan V
Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Jun; 80(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 28181353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance of Connecticut New Arch Wires, Stainless Steel and Titanium Molybdenum Alloy Archwires Against Different Brackets.
Suryavanshi S; Lingareddy U; Ahmed N; Neelakantappa KK; Sidiqha N; Minz M
Cureus; 2019 Nov; 11(11):e6131. PubMed ID: 31886067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
