These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26278725)

  • 21. Validating an approach to overcome the immeasurable time bias in cohort studies: a real-world example and Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Oh IS; Jeong HE; Lee H; Filion KB; Noh Y; Shin JY
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1534-1544. PubMed ID: 37172269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A measurement error model with a Poisson distributed surrogate.
    Li L; Palta M; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(16):2527-36. PubMed ID: 15287082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Simultaneously modelling censored survival data and repeatedly measured covariates: a Gibbs sampling approach.
    Faucett CL; Thomas DC
    Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(15):1663-85. PubMed ID: 8858789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A non-iterative extension of the multivariate random effects meta-analysis.
    Makambi KH; Seung H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):109-23. PubMed ID: 24835926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study.
    Rodríguez De Gil P; Bellara AP; Lanehart RE; Lee RS; Kim ES; Kromrey JD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):520-32. PubMed ID: 26610250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
    Laubender RP; Bender R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bias reduction in effectiveness analyses of longitudinal ordinal doses with a mixed-effects propensity adjustment.
    Leon AC; Hedeker D; Teres JJ
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):110-23. PubMed ID: 16345035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adjusting for bias introduced by instrumental variable estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Martínez-Camblor P; Mackenzie T; Staiger DO; Goodney PP; O'Malley AJ
    Biostatistics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 29267847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of the Weibull hazard model to estimate age-specific probability of permanent tooth loss.
    Otani K; Ohtaki M; Fujita M
    J Dent Res; 1996 Jul; 75(7):1458-63. PubMed ID: 8876597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimation of parametric failure time distributions based on interval-censored data with irregular dependent follow-up.
    Zhu Y; Lawless JF; Cotton CA
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(10):1548-1567. PubMed ID: 28132401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model.
    Caruana E; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M; Pirracchio R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1415-22.e2. PubMed ID: 26050059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prior event rate ratio adjustment: numerical studies of a statistical method to address unrecognized confounding in observational studies.
    Yu M; Xie D; Wang X; Weiner MG; Tannen RL
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():60-8. PubMed ID: 22552981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1074-81. PubMed ID: 16709616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Errors associated with metabolic control analysis. Application Of Monte-Carlo simulation of experimental data.
    Ainscow EK; Brand MD
    J Theor Biol; 1998 Sep; 194(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 9778435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bias in the study of prediction of change: a Monte Carlo simulation study of the effects of selective attrition and inappropriate modeling of regression toward the mean.
    Gustavson K; Borren I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():133. PubMed ID: 25519494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bayesian random-effects threshold regression with application to survival data with nonproportional hazards.
    Pennell ML; Whitmore GA; Ting Lee ML
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jan; 11(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 19828558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of methods for imputing ordinal data using multivariate normal imputation: a case study of non-linear effects in a large cohort study.
    Lee KJ; Galati JC; Simpson JA; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4164-74. PubMed ID: 22826110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.