These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26279309)

  • 1. Assessing hippocampal development and language in early childhood: Evidence from a new application of the Automatic Segmentation Adapter Tool.
    Lee JK; Nordahl CW; Amaral DG; Lee A; Solomon M; Ghetti S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Nov; 36(11):4483-96. PubMed ID: 26279309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hippocampus and amygdala volumes from magnetic resonance images in children: Assessing accuracy of FreeSurfer and FSL against manual segmentation.
    Schoemaker D; Buss C; Head K; Sandman CA; Davis EP; Chakravarty MM; Gauthier S; Pruessner JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():1-14. PubMed ID: 26824403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic segmentation of the hippocampus for preterm neonates from early-in-life to term-equivalent age.
    Guo T; Winterburn JL; Pipitone J; Duerden EG; Park MT; Chau V; Poskitt KJ; Grunau RE; Synnes A; Miller SP; Mallar Chakravarty M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 9():176-93. PubMed ID: 26740912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
    Pipitone J; Park MT; Winterburn J; Lett TA; Lerch JP; Pruessner JC; Lepage M; Voineskos AN; Chakravarty MM;
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():494-512. PubMed ID: 24784800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing manual and automatic segmentation of hippocampal volumes: reliability and validity issues in younger and older brains.
    Wenger E; Mårtensson J; Noack H; Bodammer NC; Kühn S; Schaefer S; Heinze HJ; Düzel E; Bäckman L; Lindenberger U; Lövdén M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Aug; 35(8):4236-48. PubMed ID: 24532539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hippocampal volume change measurement: quantitative assessment of the reproducibility of expert manual outlining and the automated methods FreeSurfer and FIRST.
    Mulder ER; de Jong RA; Knol DL; van Schijndel RA; Cover KS; Visser PJ; Barkhof F; Vrenken H;
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92():169-81. PubMed ID: 24521851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Freesurfer and multi-atlas MUSE for brain anatomy segmentation: Findings about size and age bias, and inter-scanner stability in multi-site aging studies.
    Srinivasan D; Erus G; Doshi J; Wolk DA; Shou H; Habes M; Davatzikos C;
    Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117248. PubMed ID: 32860881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and bias of automatic hippocampal segmentation in children and adolescents.
    Herten A; Konrad K; Krinzinger H; Seitz J; von Polier GG
    Brain Struct Funct; 2019 Mar; 224(2):795-810. PubMed ID: 30511334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation.
    Wang H; Das SR; Suh JW; Altinay M; Pluta J; Craige C; Avants B; Yushkevich PA;
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):968-85. PubMed ID: 21237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Segmentation errors and intertest reliability in automated and manually traced hippocampal volumes.
    Brinkmann BH; Guragain H; Kenney-Jung D; Mandrekar J; Watson RE; Welker KM; Britton JW; Witte RJ
    Ann Clin Transl Neurol; 2019 Sep; 6(9):1807-1814. PubMed ID: 31489797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust Machine Learning-Based Correction on Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum and Brainstem.
    Wang JY; Ngo MM; Hessl D; Hagerman RJ; Rivera SM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156123. PubMed ID: 27213683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility of Brain MRI Segmentation Algorithms: Empirical Comparison of Local MAP PSTAPLE, FreeSurfer, and FSL-FIRST.
    Velasco-Annis C; Akhondi-Asl A; Stamm A; Warfield SK
    J Neuroimaging; 2018 Mar; 28(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 29134725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating accuracy of striatal, pallidal, and thalamic segmentation methods: Comparing automated approaches to manual delineation.
    Makowski C; Béland S; Kostopoulos P; Bhagwat N; Devenyi GA; Malla AK; Joober R; Lepage M; Chakravarty MM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():182-198. PubMed ID: 28259781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing a convolutional neural network-based hippocampal segmentation method in a stroke population.
    Zavaliangos-Petropulu A; Tubi MA; Haddad E; Zhu A; Braskie MN; Jahanshad N; Thompson PM; Liew SL
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jan; 43(1):234-243. PubMed ID: 33067842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training labels for hippocampal segmentation based on the EADC-ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol.
    Boccardi M; Bocchetta M; Morency FC; Collins DL; Nishikawa M; Ganzola R; Grothe MJ; Wolf D; Redolfi A; Pievani M; Antelmi L; Fellgiebel A; Matsuda H; Teipel S; Duchesne S; Jack CR; Frisoni GB;
    Alzheimers Dement; 2015 Feb; 11(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 25616957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of hippocampal segmentation methods on correlations with clinical data.
    Aljondi R; Szoeke C; Steward C; Lui E; Alghamdi S; Desmond P
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):953-963. PubMed ID: 31718255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic hippocampal segmentation in temporal lobe epilepsy: impact of developmental abnormalities.
    Kim H; Chupin M; Colliot O; Bernhardt BC; Bernasconi N; Bernasconi A
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(4):3178-86. PubMed ID: 22155377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subcortical and hippocampal brain segmentation in 5-year-old children: Validation of FSL-FIRST and FreeSurfer against manual segmentation.
    Lidauer K; Pulli EP; Copeland A; Silver E; Kumpulainen V; Hashempour N; Merisaari H; Saunavaara J; Parkkola R; Lähdesmäki T; Saukko E; Nolvi S; Kataja EL; Karlsson L; Karlsson H; Tuulari JJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 56(5):4619-4641. PubMed ID: 35799402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing a deep convolutional neural network for automated hippocampus segmentation in a longitudinal sample of healthy participants.
    Nogovitsyn N; Souza R; Muller M; Srajer A; Hassel S; Arnott SR; Davis AD; Hall GB; Harris JK; Zamyadi M; Metzak PD; Ismail Z; Bray SL; Lebel C; Addington JM; Milev R; Harkness KL; Frey BN; Lam RW; Strother SC; Goldstein BI; Rotzinger S; Kennedy SH; MacQueen GM
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():589-597. PubMed ID: 31075395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative performance evaluation of automated segmentation methods of hippocampus from magnetic resonance images of temporal lobe epilepsy patients.
    Hosseini MP; Nazem-Zadeh MR; Pompili D; Jafari-Khouzani K; Elisevich K; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):538. PubMed ID: 26745947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.