BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2628072)

  • 1. Characterization of a human tumour cell line panel for screening of anti-tumour agents in vitro.
    Fricker SP; Buckley RG
    Biochem Soc Trans; 1989 Dec; 17(6):1049-50. PubMed ID: 2628072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemosensitivity testing of fresh human leukemia cells using both a dye exclusion assay and a tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay.
    Kirkpatrick DL; Duke M; Goh TS
    Leuk Res; 1990; 14(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 2345469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the rapid automated MTT-assay with a dye exclusion assay for chemosensitivity testing in childhood leukaemia.
    Pieters R; Huismans DR; Leyva A; Veerman AJ
    Br J Cancer; 1989 Feb; 59(2):217-20. PubMed ID: 2930687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chemosensitivity testing of human lung cancer cell lines using the MTT assay.
    Carmichael J; Mitchell JB; DeGraff WG; Gamson J; Gazdar AF; Johnson BE; Glatstein E; Minna JD
    Br J Cancer; 1988 Jun; 57(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 2841961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of in vitro anticancer-drug-screening data generated with a tetrazolium assay versus a protein assay against a diverse panel of human tumor cell lines.
    Rubinstein LV; Shoemaker RH; Paull KD; Simon RM; Tosini S; Skehan P; Scudiero DA; Monks A; Boyd MR
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1990 Jul; 82(13):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2359137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A tumor sensitivity test, SDI test using XTT].
    Kondo T; Tatematsu A; Sato Y; Ishikawa M
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1991 Jan; 18(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 1987893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of antineoplastic agents by MTT assay: partial underestimation of antiproliferative properties.
    Sobottka SB; Berger MR
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 1992; 30(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 1505077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical benefit of the histoculture drug response assay.
    Hoffman RM
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 May; 27 Suppl 2():321-2. PubMed ID: 10895174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The hollow fiber assay.
    Hall LA; Krauthauser CM; Wexler RS; Slee AM; Kerr JS
    Methods Mol Med; 2003; 74():545-66. PubMed ID: 12415720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of chemosensitivity tests: clonogenic assay versus MTT assay.
    Kawada K; Yonei T; Ueoka H; Kiura K; Tabata M; Takigawa N; Harada M; Tanimoto M
    Acta Med Okayama; 2002 Jun; 56(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12108583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the relative cytotoxic effects of anticancer agents in serum-supplemented versus serum-free media using a tetrazolium colorimetric assay.
    Tsai CM; Perng RP; Chang KT; Venzon D; Gazdar AF
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 1996 Jan; 87(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 8609055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The MTT assay for chemosensitivity testing of human tumors of the central nervous system. Part II: Evaluation of patient- and drug-specific variables.
    Nikkhah G; Tonn JC; Hoffmann O; Kraemer HP; Darling JL; Schachenmayr W; Schönmayr R
    J Neurooncol; 1992 May; 13(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 1613536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Estimating doses of anti-cancer agents in sensitivity tests in vitro].
    Kobayashi K; Takemoto T; Hino M; Hayashihara K; Nakahiro K; Wasai S; Niitani H
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1992 Mar; 19(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 1543368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assay of anticancer drugs in tissue culture: comparison of a tetrazolium-based assay and a protein binding dye assay in short-term cultures derived from human malignant glioma.
    Haselsberger K; Peterson DC; Thomas DG; Darling JL
    Anticancer Drugs; 1996 May; 7(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 8792008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Sensitivity test of anti-tumor agents. 2. Application of MTT assay].
    Wada Y; Tomiyoshi Y; Fujimaru J; Ogura M; Yoshida S; Takeda Y
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1991 Aug; 18(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 1908212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictability of in vivo chemosensitivity by in vitro MTT assay with reference to the clonogenic assay.
    Shimoyama Y; Kubota T; Watanabe M; Ishibiki K; Abe O
    J Surg Oncol; 1989 May; 41(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 2716329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of indolyl thiazoles.
    Moody CJ; Roffey JR; Stephens MA; Stratford IJ
    Anticancer Drugs; 1997 Jun; 8(5):489-99. PubMed ID: 9215613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Chemosensitivity test for thyroid cancer by in vitro MTT assay].
    Sasaki F; Ishimura H; Takada N; Uchino J
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1995 Oct; 22(12):1777-81. PubMed ID: 7574809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The combination of the tetrazolium derivative reduction (MTT) and digital cell image analysis to monitor in vitro the cytotoxicity of anti-neoplastic drugs.
    Etievant C; Kruczynski A; Pauwels O; Kiss R
    Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(1):305-11. PubMed ID: 2018364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two colorimetric assays as cytotoxicity endpoints for an in vitro screen for antitumour agents.
    Fricker SP; Buckley RG
    Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(6B):3755-60. PubMed ID: 9042253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.