246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26281261)
1. [Reliability of iWitness photogrammetry in maxillofacial application].
Jiang C; Song Q; He W; Chen S; Hong T
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 33(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26281261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application.
Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse A; Grätz KW; Matthews F
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):763-7. PubMed ID: 20485043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements.
Metzler P; Sun Y; Zemann W; Bartella A; Lehner M; Obwegeser JA; Kruse-Gujer AL; Lübbers HT
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 18(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 23559195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical validation of the Di3D stereophotogrammetry surface imaging system.
Winder RJ; Darvann TA; McKnight W; Magee JD; Ramsay-Baggs P
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 17980940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the 3dMDface system as a tool for soft tissue analysis.
Hong C; Choi K; Kachroo Y; Kwon T; Nguyen A; McComb R; Moon W
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):119-124. PubMed ID: 28643910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.
Wong JY; Oh AK; Ohta E; Hunt AT; Rogers GF; Mulliken JB; Deutsch CK
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 May; 45(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18452351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Head Orientation Influence 3D Facial Imaging? A Study on Accuracy and Precision of Stereophotogrammetric Acquisition.
Battistoni G; Cassi D; Magnifico M; Pedrazzi G; Di Blasio M; Vaienti B; Di Blasio A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33920674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reproducibility of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for the maxillofacial anthropometric measurement on cleft patients.
Othman SA; Saffai L; Wan Hassan WN
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Aug; 24(8):2853-2866. PubMed ID: 31754872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noninvasive computerized scanning method for the correlation between the facial soft and hard tissues for an integrated three-dimensional anthropometry and cephalometry.
Galantucci LM; Percoco G; Lavecchia F; Di Gioia E
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):797-804. PubMed ID: 23714883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition.
Aynechi N; Larson BE; Leon-Salazar V; Beiraghi S
Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 21208076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The 3dMD photogrammetric photo system in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: Validation of interexaminer variations and perceptions.
Nord F; Ferjencik R; Seifert B; Lanzer M; Gander T; Matthews F; Rücker M; Lübbers HT
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1798-803. PubMed ID: 26421470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementing a superimposition and measurement model for 3D sagittal analysis of therapy-induced changes in facial soft tissue: a pilot study.
Hoefert CS; Bacher M; Herberts T; Krimmel M; Reinert S; Hoefert S; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2010 May; 71(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 20503004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system.
Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Assessment of precision and accuracy of digital surface photogrammetry with the DSP 400 system].
Krimmel M; Kluba S; Dietz K; Reinert S
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Mar; 50(3):45-53. PubMed ID: 15832575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
