166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26282015)
1. Effectiveness of an audience response system on orthodontic knowledge retention of undergraduate dental students--a randomised control trial.
Robson N; Popat H; Richmond S; Farnell DJ
J Orthod; 2015; 42(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 26282015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.
Alharbi F; Alazmi KF; El Momani BR; Al-Muzian L; Wertheimer M; Almukhtar A; Almuzian M
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):435. PubMed ID: 33198761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.
Dhaliwal HK; Allen M; Kang J; Bates C; Hodge T
J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 25849094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The audience response system and knowledge gain: a prospective study.
Tregonning AM; Doherty DA; Hornbuckle J; Dickinson JE
Med Teach; 2012; 34(4):e269-74. PubMed ID: 22455719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course.
Miller CJ; McNear J; Metz MJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Dec; 37(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 24292912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of an audience response system in a preclinical operative dentistry course.
Elashvili A; Denehy GE; Dawson DV; Cunningham MA
J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1296-303. PubMed ID: 18981208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Audience Response System in Enhancing Teaching of Anatomy and Physiology for Health Sciences Students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
Baashar A; Kumar RS; Akhtar SMI; Alyousif SM; Alhassan AI; Townsi N
Adv Med Educ Pract; 2023; 14():421-432. PubMed ID: 37139014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents.
Schackow TE; Chavez M; Loya L; Friedman M
Fam Med; 2004; 36(7):496-504. PubMed ID: 15243831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interactive audience response systems in oral and maxillofacial radiology undergraduate lectures.
de Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C; Rodrigues CT; Domaneschi C; Caldeira Monteiro SA
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Feb; 22(1):e63-e69. PubMed ID: 28294484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pilot study comparing simulation-based and didactic lecture-based critical care teaching for final-year medical students.
Solymos O; O'Kelly P; Walshe CM
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 Oct; 15():153. PubMed ID: 26490826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incorporating an audience response system into veterinary dermatology lectures: effect on student knowledge retention and satisfaction.
Plant JD
J Vet Med Educ; 2007; 34(5):674-7. PubMed ID: 18326780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Lecture-Based Learning vs Discussion-Based Learning in Undergraduate Medical Students.
Zhao B; Potter DD
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 26572094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Training in radiographic caries detection and staging using an interactive tool.
Anamali S; Pendleton C; Jin Xie X; Smith A; Jain A
Eur J Dent Educ; 2022 Nov; 26(4):728-732. PubMed ID: 34939265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Audience-response systems for evaluation of pediatric lectures--comparison with a classic end-of-term online-based evaluation.
Bode SF; Straub C; Giesler M; Biller S; Forster J; Krüger M
GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(2):Doc18. PubMed ID: 26038683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the learning potential of an interactive digital game versus an interactive-style didactic lecture: the continued importance of didactic teaching in medical student education.
Courtier J; Webb EM; Phelps AS; Naeger DM
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Dec; 46(13):1787-1796. PubMed ID: 27580908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
