166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26282015)
21. Quiz game teaching format versus didactic lectures.
Aljezawi M; Albashtawy M
Br J Nurs; 2015 Jan 22-Feb 11; 24(2):86, 88-92. PubMed ID: 25615992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Simulation-Based Learning Versus Didactic Lecture in Teaching Bronchial Asthma for Undergraduate Medical Students: a Step Toward Improvement of Clinical Competencies.
Tawfik MMR; Fayed AA; Dawood AF; Al Mussaed E; Ibrahim GH
Med Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 30(3):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 34457768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Techniques for teaching electrocardiogram interpretation: self-directed learning is less effective than a workshop or lecture.
Mahler SA; Wolcott CJ; Swoboda TK; Wang H; Arnold TC
Med Educ; 2011 Apr; 45(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 21401682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomised controlled trial comparing two methods of teaching medical students trauma and orthopaedics: traditional lectures versus the "donut round".
Bulstrode C; Gallagher FA; Pilling EL; Furniss D; Proctor RD
Surgeon; 2003 Apr; 1(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 15573624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bridging the gap in 1(st) year dental material curriculum: A 3 year randomized cross over trial.
Gali S; Shetty V; Murthy NS; Marimuthu P
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 26929520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using paper presentation breaks during didactic lectures improves learning of physiology in undergraduate students.
Ghorbani A; Ghazvini K
Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 26873895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiologist/Educator knowledge of the audience response system and limitations to its use.
Nicholson BT; Bassignani MJ
Acad Radiol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1555-60. PubMed ID: 19836271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of an audience response system in teaching pharmacology to baccalaureate nursing students.
Vana KD; Silva GE; Muzyka D; Hirani LM
Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):TC105-13. PubMed ID: 21701273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A survey of undergraduate orthodontic teaching and factors affecting pursuit of postgraduate training.
Jauhar P; Mossey PA; Popat H; Seehra J; Fleming PS
Br Dent J; 2016 Oct; 221(8):487-492. PubMed ID: 27767152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of prelecture assignment to enhance learning in pharmacology lectures for the 2
Ahsan M; Mallick AK
Indian J Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 48(Suppl 1):S65-S68. PubMed ID: 28031612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Crossover trial of an audience response system application for smartphone in undergraduate medical students.
Lours C; Sujobert P
MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():215. PubMed ID: 38074600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Anonymous Audience Response Technology in Image-Based Quiz (IBQ) Neuropathology Lecture for Undergraduate Pre-clinical Medical Students: a Comparison with Traditional Lectures.
Liew SC; Naik V; Azim DHF
Med Sci Educ; 2021 Dec; 31(6):1889-1894. PubMed ID: 34956703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A controlled study of improvements in student exam performance with the use of an audience response system during medical school lectures.
Stoddard HA; Piquette CA
Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S37-40. PubMed ID: 20881700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning in medical education.
Issa N; Schuller M; Santacaterina S; Shapiro M; Wang E; Mayer RE; DaRosa DA
Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):818-26. PubMed ID: 21752078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of an audience response system during peer teaching among physical therapy students in human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.
Wait KR; Cloud BA; Forster LA; Jones TM; Nokleby JJ; Wolfe CR; Youdas JW
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 19764082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effectiveness of an audience response system in teaching pharmacology to baccalaureate nursing students.
Vana KD; Silva GE; Muzyka D; Hirani LM
Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Jun; 29(6):326-34; quiz 335-6. PubMed ID: 20978436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A learner-control instructional multimedia program is as effective as a program-control version in undergraduate orthodontic teaching.
Bearn D
Evid Based Dent; 2007; 8(1):18. PubMed ID: 17380178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomised trial of an online lecture with and without audio.
Spickard A; Smithers J; Cordray D; Gigante J; Wofford JL
Med Educ; 2004 Jul; 38(7):787-90. PubMed ID: 15200403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Blended learning as an adjunct to tutor-led seminars in undergraduate orthodontics: a randomised controlled trial.
Jeganathan S; Fleming PS
Br Dent J; 2020 Mar; 228(5):371-375. PubMed ID: 32170259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
