These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26282074)
1. Superior biofunctionality of dental implant fixtures uniformly coated with durable bioglass films by magnetron sputtering. Popa AC; Stan GE; Enculescu M; Tanase C; Tulyaganov DU; Ferreira JM J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Nov; 51():313-27. PubMed ID: 26282074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo evaluation of bioactive glass-based coatings on dental implants in a dog implantation model. van Oirschot BA; Alghamdi HS; Närhi TO; Anil S; Al Farraj Aldosari A; van den Beucken JJ; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23078340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of bioactive glass coated and hydroxyapatite coated titanium dental implants in the human jaw bone. Mistry S; Kundu D; Datta S; Basu D Aust Dent J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21332743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of thin amorphous calcium phosphate coatings on titanium dental implants deposited using magnetron sputtering. Yokota S; Nishiwaki N; Ueda K; Narushima T; Kawamura H; Takahashi T Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 24819811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of biocompatibility and osseointegration of ceramic and titanium implants: an in vivo and in vitro study. Möller B; Terheyden H; Açil Y; Purcz NM; Hertrampf K; Tabakov A; Behrens E; Wiltfang J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 41(5):638-45. PubMed ID: 22406235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro enhancement of SAOS-2 cell calcified matrix deposition onto radio frequency magnetron sputtered bioglass-coated titanium scaffolds. Saino E; Maliardi V; Quartarone E; Fassina L; Benedetti L; De Angelis MG; Mustarelli P; Facchini A; Visai L Tissue Eng Part A; 2010 Mar; 16(3):995-1008. PubMed ID: 19839719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biocompatibility and biofunctionality of implanted materials. Cook SD; Dalton JE Alpha Omegan; 1992; 85(4):41-7. PubMed ID: 1308341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Highly adherent bioactive glass thin films synthetized by magnetron sputtering at low temperature. Stan GE; Pasuk I; Husanu MA; Enculescu I; Pina S; Lemos AF; Tulyaganov DU; El Mabrouk K; Ferreira JM J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2011 Dec; 22(12):2693-710. PubMed ID: 21915698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Synthesis of bioactive and machinable miserite glass-ceramics for dental implant applications. Saadaldin SA; Dixon SJ; Costa DO; Rizkalla AS Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):645-55. PubMed ID: 23587360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of magnetron sputtering for producing ceramic coatings on implant materials. Jansen JA; Wolke JG; Swann S; Van der Waerden JP; de Groot K Clin Oral Implants Res; 1993 Mar; 4(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 8329535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The synergistic effect of hierarchical micro/nano-topography and bioactive ions for enhanced osseointegration. Zhang W; Wang G; Liu Y; Zhao X; Zou D; Zhu C; Jin Y; Huang Q; Sun J; Liu X; Jiang X; Zreiqat H Biomaterials; 2013 Apr; 34(13):3184-95. PubMed ID: 23380352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structure, phases, and mechanical response of Ti-alloy bioactive glass composite coatings. Nelson GM; Nychka JA; McDonald AG Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Mar; 36():261-76. PubMed ID: 24433912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Submicrometer Hollow Bioglass Cones Deposited by Radio Frequency Magnetron Sputtering: Formation Mechanism, Properties, and Prospective Biomedical Applications. Popa AC; Stan GE; Besleaga C; Ion L; Maraloiu VA; Tulyaganov DU; Ferreira JM ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2016 Feb; 8(7):4357-67. PubMed ID: 26836256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioactive glass microspheres as osteopromotive inlays in macrotextured surfaces of Ti and CoCr alloy bone implants: trapezoidal surface grooves without inlay most efficient in resisting torsional forces. Keränen P; Moritz N; Alm JJ; Ylänen H; Kommonen B; Aro HT J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Oct; 4(7):1483-91. PubMed ID: 21783158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [In vitro bioactivity of HA/Ti6Al4V composite implant fabricated by RF magnetron sputtering]. Zhang Q; Zhao Y; Lin D Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Dec; 24(6):1319-24. PubMed ID: 18232485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo evaluation of micro-rough and bioactive titanium dental implants using histometry and pull-out tests. Aparicio C; Padrós A; Gil FJ J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1672-82. PubMed ID: 22098868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study on the bone-screw interface of bioactive ceramic-coated titanium screws. Lee JH; Ryu HS; Lee DS; Hong KS; Chang BS; Lee CK Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(16):3249-57. PubMed ID: 15603820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of a bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate) in the maintenance of alveolar ridges and in osseointegration of titanium implants. Roriz VM; Rosa AL; Peitl O; Zanotto ED; Panzeri H; de Oliveira PT Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 19912271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]