191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26282093)
1. Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ohno MS; Richardson ML; Sokol ER
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 26282093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. To sling or not to sling at time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Richardson ML; Elliott CS; Shaw JG; Comiter CV; Chen B; Sokol ER
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1306-12. PubMed ID: 23524201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Ren C; Song XC; Zhu L; Ai FF; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Chen J; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):369-373. PubMed ID: 28647958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apical prolapse.
Barber MD; Maher C
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1815-33. PubMed ID: 24142057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis.
Zhang W; Cheon WC; Zhang L; Wang X; Wei Y; Lyu C
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jan; 33(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 34081163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.
Heinonen PK; Nieminen K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21561703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.
Nager CW; Grimes CL; Nolen TL; Wai CY; Brubaker L; Jeppson PC; Wilson TS; Visco AG; Barber MD; Sutkin G; Norton P; Rardin CR; Arya L; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29232267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
Barber MD; Brubaker L; Burgio KL; Richter HE; Nygaard I; Weidner AC; Menefee SA; Lukacz ES; Norton P; Schaffer J; Nguyen JN; Borello-France D; Goode PS; Jakus-Waldman S; Spino C; Warren LK; Gantz MG; Meikle SF;
JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1023-34. PubMed ID: 24618964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
Meyer I; Whitworth RE; Lukacz ES; Smith AL; Sung VW; Visco AG; Ackenbom MF; Wai CY; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG; Richter HE;
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2155-2164. PubMed ID: 32146521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Utility Analysis of Midurethral Sling Timing Among Women Undergoing Prolapse Surgery.
Sassani JC; Giugale LE; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
Urogynecology (Phila); 2024 Jan; 30(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 37493280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.
Bastani P; Tayebi S; Ghabousian A; Salehi-Pourmehr H; Hajebrahimi S
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1857-1862. PubMed ID: 35347369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vaginal hysteropexy compared with vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A 5-year cost-effectiveness Markov model.
Wallace SL; Syan R; Lee K; Sokol ER
BJOG; 2024 Feb; 131(3):362-371. PubMed ID: 37667669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study.
Maher CF; Qatawneh AM; Dwyer PL; Carey MP; Cornish A; Schluter PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 14749629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.
Maher C; Baessler K; Glazener CM; Adams EJ; Hagen S
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 18092333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year surgical outcomes of transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
Meyer I; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Richter HE
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Sep; 34(9):2171-2181. PubMed ID: 37039859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Permanent or absorbable suture material for sacrospinous ligament fixation: Does it matter?
Padoa A; Ziv Y; Tsviban A; Tomashev R; Smorgick N; Fligelman T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Apr; 283():112-117. PubMed ID: 36827752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation on clinical effectiveness of modified laparoscopic sacral colpopexy].
Zhang XW; Xu L; Li YX; Gan YP; Chen LQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):570-4. PubMed ID: 24199920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Study on ischiospinous ligament fixation in treatment of stage III pelvic organ prolapse].
Chen J; Zhu L; Lang JH; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Gong XM
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 47(7):492-5. PubMed ID: 23141157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
