575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26282209)
1. Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.
Blaivas JG; Purohit RS; Benedon MS; Mekel G; Stern M; Billah M; Olugbade K; Bendavid R; Iakovlev V
Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Sep; 12(9):481-509. PubMed ID: 26282209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Midurethral Fascial "Sling on a String": An Alternative to Midurethral Synthetic Tapes in the Era of Mesh Complications.
Osman NI; Hillary CJ; Mangera A; Aldamanhoori R; Inman RD; Chapple CR
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 29803585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling.
Blaivas JG; Simma-Chiang V; Gul Z; Dayan L; Kalkan S; Daniel M
Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 30466701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Slings in surgery of genuine stress incontinence.
Secco S; Crestani A; Cattaneo F; Ficarra V; Zattoni F; Novara G
World J Urol; 2012 Aug; 30(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 22002835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.
Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Carranza Leon DA; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 26811112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of single-incision mini-slings (Ajust) and standard transobturator midurethral slings (Align) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: A 1-year follow-up.
Chang CP; Chang WH; Hsu YM; Chen YJ; Wen KC; Chao KC; Yen MS; Horng HC; Wang PH;
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):726-30. PubMed ID: 26700993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling.
Milose JC; Sharp KM; He C; Stoffel J; Clemens JQ; Cameron AP
J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):916-20. PubMed ID: 25245488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal erosion after hybrid midurethral sling placement.
Bong GW; Rovner ES
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1343.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17141829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension.
Cayan F; Dilek S; Akbay E; Cayan S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 277(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17653739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of urinary fistulas due to midurethral sling surgery.
Blaivas JG; Mekel G
J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 24742595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the local carcinogenic potential of mesh used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
Linder BJ; Trabuco EC; Carranza DA; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1333-6. PubMed ID: 26864666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autologous Slings in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Grigoryan B; Kasyan G; Pushkar D
Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Apr; 35(4):759-773. PubMed ID: 38520517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sling location in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence following midurethral sling.
Gilchrist AS; Rovner ES
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 22014964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are patients willing to trade cure rate against less pain? Patients' preferences for single incision midurethral sling or transobturator standard midurethral sling.
Schellart RP; Casteleijn FM; Dijkgraaf MGW; Tutolo M; Roovers JWR
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Apr; 36(4):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 27564322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disabling complications with slings for managing female stress urinary incontinence.
Ordorica R; Rodriguez AR; Coste-Delvecchio F; Hoffman M; Lockhart J
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 18384633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study among autologous and synthetic slings in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence].
De Vita D; Araco F; Aydar Natalin R; Riccetto C; Nardi Pedro R; Palma P
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Dec; 60(6):469-73. PubMed ID: 18981974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence.
Kokanali MK; Doğanay M; Aksakal O; Cavkaytar S; Topçu HO; Özer İ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():146-50. PubMed ID: 24793930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Update on complications of synthetic suburethral slings.
Gomes CM; Carvalho FL; Bellucci CHS; Hemerly TS; Baracat F; de Bessa J; Srougi M; Bruschini H
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(5):822-834. PubMed ID: 28266818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
