150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26282713)
1. Tumor volume in insignificant prostate cancer: Increasing the threshold is a safe approach to reduce over-treatment.
Ting F; van Leeuwen PJ; Delprado W; Haynes AM; Brenner P; Stricker PD
Prostate; 2015 Nov; 75(15):1768-73. PubMed ID: 26282713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Nelson BA; Shappell SB; Chang SS; Wells N; Farnham SB; Smith JA; Cookson MS
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 16686706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tumor volume in insignificant prostate cancer: increasing threshold gains increasing risk.
Schiffmann J; Connan J; Salomon G; Boehm K; Beyer B; Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Sauter G; Karakiewicz PI; Graefen M; Huland H
Prostate; 2015 Jan; 75(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 25284155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor percentage but not number of tumor foci predicts disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy especially in high-risk patients.
Hinkelammert R; Eminaga O; Bettendorf O; Eltze E; Abbas M; Hertle L; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 May; 32(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 24332639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.
Hansen J; Bianchi M; Sun M; Rink M; Castiglione F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Ahyai SA; Steurer S; Göbel C; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 24053339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins.
Meyer CP; Hansen J; Boehm K; Tilki D; Abdollah F; Trinh QD; Fisch M; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H; Chun FK; Ahyai SA
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 27260503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tumor volume does not predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with surgical Gleason score 6 or less prostate cancer.
Merrill MM; Lane BR; Reuther AM; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C; Klein EA
Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 17826492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prognostic role of the pathological T2 subclassification for prostate cancer in the 2002 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis staging system.
van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kok DE; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18336608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-adjusted hazard rates of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.
Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):412-19. PubMed ID: 19027223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.
Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Briski LM; Nemov I; Punnen S; Kwon D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):866-873. PubMed ID: 34184782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
