These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26282713)

  • 1. Tumor volume in insignificant prostate cancer: Increasing the threshold is a safe approach to reduce over-treatment.
    Ting F; van Leeuwen PJ; Delprado W; Haynes AM; Brenner P; Stricker PD
    Prostate; 2015 Nov; 75(15):1768-73. PubMed ID: 26282713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Isbarn H; Steuber T; Eichelberg C; Köllermann J; Fisch M; Karakiewicz PI; Huland H; Graefen M; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 20128781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tumour volume is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Nelson BA; Shappell SB; Chang SS; Wells N; Farnham SB; Smith JA; Cookson MS
    BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1169-72. PubMed ID: 16686706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tumor volume in insignificant prostate cancer: increasing threshold gains increasing risk.
    Schiffmann J; Connan J; Salomon G; Boehm K; Beyer B; Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Sauter G; Karakiewicz PI; Graefen M; Huland H
    Prostate; 2015 Jan; 75(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 25284155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tumor percentage but not number of tumor foci predicts disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy especially in high-risk patients.
    Hinkelammert R; Eminaga O; Bettendorf O; Eltze E; Abbas M; Hertle L; Semjonow A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 May; 32(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 24332639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
    Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
    Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.
    Hansen J; Bianchi M; Sun M; Rink M; Castiglione F; Abdollah F; Steuber T; Ahyai SA; Steurer S; Göbel C; Freschi M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 24053339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins.
    Meyer CP; Hansen J; Boehm K; Tilki D; Abdollah F; Trinh QD; Fisch M; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H; Chun FK; Ahyai SA
    World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 27260503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tumor volume does not predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with surgical Gleason score 6 or less prostate cancer.
    Merrill MM; Lane BR; Reuther AM; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C; Klein EA
    Urology; 2007 Aug; 70(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 17826492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The prognostic role of the pathological T2 subclassification for prostate cancer in the 2002 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis staging system.
    van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kok DE; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk-adjusted hazard rates of biochemical recurrence for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.
    Walz J; Chun FK; Klein EA; Reuther A; Graefen M; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):412-19. PubMed ID: 19027223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.
    Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Briski LM; Nemov I; Punnen S; Kwon D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
    Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):866-873. PubMed ID: 34184782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.