These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26282856)

  • 1. Violating body movement semantics: Neural signatures of self-generated and external-generated errors.
    Padrao G; Gonzalez-Franco M; Sanchez-Vives MV; Slater M; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):147-156. PubMed ID: 26282856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Embodying Others in Immersive Virtual Reality: Electro-Cortical Signatures of Monitoring the Errors in the Actions of an Avatar Seen from a First-Person Perspective.
    Pavone EF; Tieri G; Rizza G; Tidoni E; Grisoni L; Aglioti SM
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(2):268-79. PubMed ID: 26758821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delayed monitoring of accuracy errors compared to commission errors in ACC.
    Bediou B; Koban L; Rosset S; Pourtois G; Sander D
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):1925-36. PubMed ID: 22353628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinct brain signatures of content and structure violation during action observation.
    Maffongelli L; Bartoli E; Sammler D; Kölsch S; Campus C; Olivier E; Fadiga L; D'Ausilio A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():30-9. PubMed ID: 26004058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error, rather than its probability, elicits specific electrocortical signatures: a combined EEG-immersive virtual reality study of action observation.
    Pezzetta R; Nicolardi V; Tidoni E; Aglioti SM
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Sep; 120(3):1107-1118. PubMed ID: 29873613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain negativity as an indicator of predictive error processing: the contribution of visual action effect monitoring.
    Joch M; Hegele M; Maurer H; Müller H; Maurer LK
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jul; 118(1):486-495. PubMed ID: 28446578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic prediction-errors are context-dependent: An ERP study.
    Jack BN; Le Pelley ME; Griffiths O; Luque D; Whitford TJ
    Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 1706():86-92. PubMed ID: 30391305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive error processing distinguishes between relevant and irrelevant errors after visuomotor learning.
    Maurer LK; Joch M; Hegele M; Maurer H; Müller H
    J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):18. PubMed ID: 30995682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the processing of sensory and reward-prediction errors involve common neural resources? Evidence from a frontocentral negative potential modulated by movement execution errors.
    Torrecillos F; Albouy P; Brochier T; Malfait N
    J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(14):4845-56. PubMed ID: 24695704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural signatures of reward and sensory error feedback processing in motor learning.
    Palidis DJ; Cashaback JGA; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Apr; 121(4):1561-1574. PubMed ID: 30811259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speeded response errors and the error-related negativity modulate early sensory processing.
    Beatty PJ; Buzzell GA; Roberts DM; McDonald CG
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():112-120. PubMed ID: 30096369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unavoidable errors: a spatio-temporal analysis of time-course and neural sources of evoked potentials associated with error processing in a speeded task.
    Vocat R; Pourtois G; Vuilleumier P
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug; 46(10):2545-55. PubMed ID: 18533202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of brain mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese characters and pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study.
    Wang T; Li H; Zhang Q; Tu S; Yu C; Qiu J
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22043890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wronger than wrong: Graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker.
    Spinelli G; Tieri G; Pavone EF; Aglioti SM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():1-10. PubMed ID: 29146376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP evidence of adaptive changes in error processing and attentional control during rhythm synchronization learning.
    Padrão G; Penhune V; de Diego-Balaguer R; Marco-Pallares J; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():460-70. PubMed ID: 24956067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Erroneous and correct actions have a different affective valence: evidence from ERPs.
    Aarts K; De Houwer J; Pourtois G
    Emotion; 2013 Oct; 13(5):960-73. PubMed ID: 23795590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When a child errs: the ERN and the Pe complex in children.
    Arbel Y; Donchin E
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jan; 48(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 20525012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why do we make mistakes? Neurocognitive processes during the preparation-perception-action cycle and error-detection.
    Perri RL; Berchicci M; Lucci G; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():320-8. PubMed ID: 25812715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical error processing: different errors, different systems.
    Krigolson OE; Holroyd CB
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():70-80. PubMed ID: 17498670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lesions to the prefrontal performance-monitoring network disrupt neural processing and adaptive behaviors after both errors and novelty.
    Wessel JR; Klein TA; Ott DV; Ullsperger M
    Cortex; 2014 Jan; 50():45-54. PubMed ID: 24139890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.