These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26283221)

  • 1. Logging The BMJ's "patient journey".
    Richards T; Snow R; Schroter S
    BMJ; 2015 Aug; 351():h4396. PubMed ID: 26283221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The BMJ's own patient journey.
    Richards T; Godlee F
    BMJ; 2014 Jun; 348():g3726. PubMed ID: 24916815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The BMJ's activism will ultimately harm its reputation.
    Tucker JA
    BMJ; 2014 Apr; 348():g2976. PubMed ID: 24781361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nature journal's plan to fast track paper for a fee prompts resignation from editorial board.
    Hawkes N
    BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1761. PubMed ID: 25829179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On editorial practice and peer review.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supporting and enhancing peer review in the BJGP.
    Moore A; Jones R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Jul; 64(624):e459-61. PubMed ID: 24982500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Twenty top papers to mark The BMJ's two digital decades.
    Payne D
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3660. PubMed ID: 26149853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
    Sohail S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MMR scare. The BMJ's measly editorial policies.
    MacFarlane N
    BMJ; 2011 Feb; 342():d809. PubMed ID: 21303893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review: should we modify our process?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rising to the challenge: next steps in
    Dobson J; Cook S; Abbasi K
    BMJ; 2024 Oct; 387():q2197. PubMed ID: 39389611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What's your rejection fraction?
    Pearlman AS
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2009 Mar; 22(3):314-5. PubMed ID: 19258178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical Mycology. Editorial.
    Salkin IF
    Med Mycol; 2012 Jan; 50(1):1. PubMed ID: 22172003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The tragedy of the reviewer commons.
    Hochberg ME; Chase JM; Gotelli NJ; Hastings A; Naeem S
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Jan; 12(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 19087107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Trainee Advisory Board: education, mentoring, and experience with the editorial process.
    McCarthy MJ; Tyrka AR
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2015 Dec; 132(6):429-30. PubMed ID: 26372406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Change to Open Peer Commentary format.
    Perlovsky L; Duermeijer C
    Phys Life Rev; 2010 Mar; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 20374915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Selected summaries].
    Müller-Lissner S
    Z Gastroenterol; 2011 Jul; 49(12):1525. PubMed ID: 22139874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double-blind peer review.
    Nat Chem Biol; 2015 Apr; 11(4):237. PubMed ID: 25785416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific letters.
    Henly SJ
    Nurs Res; 2008; 57(5):301. PubMed ID: 18794713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.