These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2628365)

  • 21. Assessing accuracy of measurements for a Wingate Test using the Taguchi method.
    Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Davies B; Baker JS
    Res Sports Med; 2008; 16(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 18373285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accurate assessment of work done and power during a Wingate anaerobic test.
    Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Baker JS; Davies B
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Apr; 32(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 17486163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of albuterol on power output in non-asthmatic athletes.
    Lemmer JT; Fleck SJ; Wallach JM; Fox S; Burke ER; Kearney JT; Storms WW
    Int J Sports Med; 1995 May; 16(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 7657418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anaerobic power of the arms and legs of young and older men.
    Marsh GD; Paterson DH; Govindasamy D; Cunningham DA
    Exp Physiol; 1999 May; 84(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 10362857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Coleman SG; Hale T
    Can J Appl Physiol; 1998 Aug; 23(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 9677437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of individual time to peak power output on the expression of peak power output in the 30-s Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Bell W; Cobner DM
    Int J Sports Med; 2007 Feb; 28(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 17133286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship of high intensity cycle ergometry.
    McNaughton L; Thomas D
    Int J Sports Med; 1996 May; 17(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8814511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anticipatory pacing strategies during supramaximal exercise lasting longer than 30 s.
    Ansley L; Robson PJ; St Clair Gibson A; Noakes TD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Feb; 36(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 14767256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of resistance settings for anaerobic power testing.
    Evans JA; Quinney HA
    Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1981 Jun; 6(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 7237675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of 'anaerobic' components of O2 debt and the Wingate test.
    Goslin BR; Graham TE
    Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1985 Sep; 10(3):134-40. PubMed ID: 4053260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validity and Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Cycle Ergometer for the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Lunn WR; Axtell RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 31453946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanical and physiological calibration of four cycle ergometers.
    Wilmore JH; Constable SH; Stanforth PR; Buono MJ; Tsao YW; Roby FB; Lowdon BJ; Ratliff RA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1982; 14(4):322-5. PubMed ID: 7132652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability and validity of a new double poling ergometer for cross-country skiers.
    Holmberg HC; Nilsson J
    J Sports Sci; 2008 Jan; 26(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 17899473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Upper and lower body anaerobic power: comparison between biathletes and control subjects.
    Patton JF; Duggan A
    Int J Sports Med; 1987 Apr; 8(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 3596883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of time of day on aerobic contribution to the 30-s Wingate test performance.
    Souissi N; Bessot N; Chamari K; Gauthier A; Sesboüé B; Davenne D
    Chronobiol Int; 2007; 24(4):739-48. PubMed ID: 17701684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How anaerobic is the Wingate Anaerobic Test for humans?
    Beneke R; Pollmann C; Bleif I; Leithäuser RM; Hütler M
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Aug; 87(4-5):388-92. PubMed ID: 12172878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative anaerobic power of men and women.
    Murphy MM; Patton JF; Frederick FA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1986 Jul; 57(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 3741284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a novel eccentric arm cycle ergometer for training the upper body.
    Elmer SJ; Danvind J; Holmberg HC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Jan; 45(1):206-11. PubMed ID: 22843110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of treadmill and cycle ergometer measurements of force-velocity relationships and power output.
    Jaskólska A; Goossens P; Veenstra B; Jaskólski A; Skinner JS
    Int J Sports Med; 1999 Apr; 20(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 10333097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measurement of maximal power output in isokinetic and non-isokinetic cycling. A comparison of two methods.
    Baron R; Bachl N; Petschnig R; Tschan H; Smekal G; Pokan R
    Int J Sports Med; 1999 Nov; 20(8):532-7. PubMed ID: 10606217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.