814 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26285121)
1. Nonconsensus Protein Binding to Repetitive DNA Sequence Elements Significantly Affects Eukaryotic Genomes.
Afek A; Cohen H; Barber-Zucker S; Gordân R; Lukatsky DB
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004429. PubMed ID: 26285121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protein-DNA binding in the absence of specific base-pair recognition.
Afek A; Schipper JL; Horton J; Gordân R; Lukatsky DB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(48):17140-5. PubMed ID: 25313048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and multiplex sequencing (ChIP-Seq) to identify global transcription factor binding sites in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
Brdlik CM; Niu W; Snyder M
Methods Enzymol; 2014; 539():89-111. PubMed ID: 24581441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive and negative design for nonconsensus protein-DNA binding affinity in the vicinity of functional binding sites.
Afek A; Lukatsky DB
Biophys J; 2013 Oct; 105(7):1653-60. PubMed ID: 24094406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecular and structural considerations of TF-DNA binding for the generation of biologically meaningful and accurate phylogenetic footprinting analysis: the LysR-type transcriptional regulator family as a study model.
Oliver P; Peralta-Gil M; Tabche ML; Merino E
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):686. PubMed ID: 27567672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonspecific transcription-factor-DNA binding influences nucleosome occupancy in yeast.
Afek A; Sela I; Musa-Lempel N; Lukatsky DB
Biophys J; 2011 Nov; 101(10):2465-75. PubMed ID: 22098745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nucleosome organization in the vicinity of transcription factor binding sites in the human genome.
Nie Y; Cheng X; Chen J; Sun X
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):493. PubMed ID: 24942981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast.
Tsai ZT; Shiu SH; Tsai HK
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004418. PubMed ID: 26291518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying cooperative transcription factors in yeast using multiple data sources.
Lai FJ; Jhu MH; Chiu CC; Huang YM; Wu WS
BMC Syst Biol; 2014; 8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. PubMed ID: 25559499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blurring of high-resolution data shows that the effect of intrinsic nucleosome occupancy on transcription factor binding is mostly regional, not local.
Goh WS; Orlov Y; Li J; Clarke ND
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Jan; 6(1):e1000649. PubMed ID: 20098497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape.
Zhou T; Shen N; Yang L; Abe N; Horton J; Mann RS; Bussemaker HJ; Gordân R; Rohs R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(15):4654-9. PubMed ID: 25775564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. De novo prediction of cis-regulatory elements and modules through integrative analysis of a large number of ChIP datasets.
Niu M; Tabari ES; Su Z
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1047. PubMed ID: 25442502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repetitive DNA symmetry elements negatively regulate gene expression in embryonic stem cells.
Mellul M; Lahav S; Imashimizu M; Tokunaga Y; Lukatsky DB; Ram O
Biophys J; 2022 Aug; 121(16):3126-3135. PubMed ID: 35810331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contribution of nucleosome binding preferences and co-occurring DNA sequences to transcription factor binding.
He X; Chatterjee R; John S; Bravo H; Sathyanarayana BK; Biddie SC; FitzGerald PC; Stamatoyannopoulos JA; Hager GL; Vinson C
BMC Genomics; 2013 Jun; 14():428. PubMed ID: 23805837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes.
Rosanova A; Colliva A; Osella M; Caselle M
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):7596. PubMed ID: 28790414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors.
Zhu C; Byers KJ; McCord RP; Shi Z; Berger MF; Newburger DE; Saulrieta K; Smith Z; Shah MV; Radhakrishnan M; Philippakis AA; Hu Y; De Masi F; Pacek M; Rolfs A; Murthy T; Labaer J; Bulyk ML
Genome Res; 2009 Apr; 19(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 19158363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
