176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26285157)
1. Inter-device comparison of retinal sensitivity measurements: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-1.
Wong EN; Mackey DA; Morgan WH; Chen FK
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26285157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interdevice comparison of retinal sensitivity assessments in a healthy population: the CenterVue MAIA and the Nidek MP-3 microperimeters.
Balasubramanian S; Uji A; Lei J; Velaga S; Nittala M; Sadda S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):109-113. PubMed ID: 28495907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MP1 AND MAIA FUNDUS PERIMETRY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS AFFECTED BY RETINAL DYSTROPHIES.
Parodi MB; Triolo G; Morales M; Borrelli E; Cicinelli MV; Cascavilla ML; Bandello F
Retina; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1662-9. PubMed ID: 26214316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test-retest variability of microperimetry using the Nidek MP1 in patients with macular disease.
Chen FK; Patel PJ; Xing W; Bunce C; Egan C; Tufail AT; Coffey PJ; Rubin GS; Da Cruz L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3464-72. PubMed ID: 19324853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.
Kulkarni SV; Coupland SG; Stitt DM; Hamilton J; Brownstein JJ; Damji KF
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 24093188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Test-Retest Repeatability of Microperimetry at the Border of Deep Scotomas.
Wu Z; Jung CJ; Ayton LN; Luu CD; Guymer RH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2606-11. PubMed ID: 25813990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the discrepancy between MAIA and MP-1 microperimetry results.
Xu L; Wu Z; Guymer RH; Anderson AJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Nov; 41(6):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 34459022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) Microperimetry in Children: Sensitivity, Reliability, and Fixation Stability in Healthy Observers.
Jones PR; Yasoubi N; Nardini M; Rubin GS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Nov; 57(14):6349-6359. PubMed ID: 27898980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter and intradevice assessment of microperimetry testing in aging eyes.
Coulibaly LM; Mohamed H; Fuchs P; Schmidt-Erfurth U; Reiter GS
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1049. PubMed ID: 38200267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual rehabilitation using microperimetric acoustic biofeedback training in individuals with central scotoma.
Ratra D; Gopalakrishnan S; Dalan D; Ratra V; Damkondwar D; Laxmi G
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30253443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microperimetry biofeedback training in a patient with bilateral myopic macular degeneration with central scotoma.
Raman R; Damkondwar D; Neriyanuri S; Sharma T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 63(6):534-6. PubMed ID: 26265646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Test-Retest Reliability of Scotopic and Mesopic Fundus-Controlled Perimetry Using a Modified MAIA (Macular Integrity Assessment) in Normal Eyes.
Pfau M; Lindner M; Fleckenstein M; Finger RP; Rubin GS; Harmening WM; Morales MU; Holz FG; Schmitz-Valckenberg S
Ophthalmologica; 2017; 237(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 27997924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and Intersession Agreement of Microperimetric and Fixation Measurements Obtained with a New Microperimeter in Normal Eyes.
Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
Curr Eye Res; 2016; 41(3):400-9. PubMed ID: 25859613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normal values for microperimetry with the MAIA microperimeter: sensitivity and fixation analysis in healthy adults and children.
Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 27(5):607-613. PubMed ID: 28127734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microperimetry and clinical practice: an evidence-based review.
Markowitz SN; Reyes SV
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):350-7. PubMed ID: 24093179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intersession test-retest variability of 10-2 MAIA microperimetry in fixation-threatening glaucoma.
Wong EN; Morgan WH; Chen FK
Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():745-752. PubMed ID: 28461736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting MAIA Microperimetry Using Age- and Retinal Loci-Specific Reference Thresholds.
Charng J; Sanfilippo PG; Attia MS; Dolliver M; Arunachalam S; Chew AL; Wong EN; Mackey DA; Chen FK
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):19. PubMed ID: 32832226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of pupil dilation on MAIA microperimetry.
Han RC; Jolly JK; Xue K; MacLaren RE
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 45(5):489-495. PubMed ID: 28002873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and Correlation of Retinal Sensitivity Between Microperimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Low-tension Glaucoma.
Tepelus TC; Song S; Nittala MG; Nassisi M; Sadda SR; Chopra V
J Glaucoma; 2020 Oct; 29(10):975-980. PubMed ID: 32649448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of retinal sensitivity and morphology during antiangiogenic treatment of retinal vein occlusion over one year.
Kriechbaum K; Prager F; Geitzenauer W; Benesch T; Schütze C; Simader C; Schmidt-Erfurth U
Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2415-21. PubMed ID: 19744723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
