181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2628523)
21. Measurement of the pressure applied during motion palpation and reliability for cervical spine rotation.
Marcotte J; Normand MC; Black P
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Oct; 28(8):591-6. PubMed ID: 16226627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The interexaminer reliability of measuring passive cervical range of motion, revisited.
Nilsson N; Christensen HW; Hartvigsen J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):302-5. PubMed ID: 8792318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measuring passive cervical motion: a study of reliability.
Nilsson N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jun; 18(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 7673795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A review of intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of static spinal palpation: a literature synthesis.
Haneline MT; Young M
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Jun; 32(5):379-86. PubMed ID: 19539121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The interrater reliability of static palpation of the thoracic spine for eliciting tenderness and stiffness to test for a manipulable lesion.
Beynon AM; Hebert JJ; Walker BF
Chiropr Man Therap; 2018; 26():49. PubMed ID: 30524705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of motion palpation for the thoracolumbar spine.
Cashley MA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1987 Oct; 10(5):265-6. PubMed ID: 3694066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Interexaminer reliability of the hip extension test for suspected impaired motor control of the lumbar spine.
Murphy DR; Byfield D; McCarthy P; Humphreys K; Gregory AA; Rochon R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jun; 29(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 16762665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a 'gold standard'.
Humphreys BK; Delahaye M; Peterson CK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2004 Jun; 5():19. PubMed ID: 15198806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Palpation for muscular tenderness in the anterior chest wall: an observer reliability study.
Christensen HW; Vach W; Manniche C; Haghfelt T; Hartvigsen L; Høilund-Carlsen PF
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Oct; 26(8):469-75. PubMed ID: 14569212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability of lumbar spinal palpation, range of motion, and determination of position.
Troke M; Schuit D; Petersen CM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Oct; 8():103. PubMed ID: 17971222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a paraspinal skin temperature differential instrument.
Plaugher G; Lopes MA; Melch PE; Cremata EE
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1991; 14(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 1919373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intertester reliability and validity of motion assessments during lumbar spine accessory motion testing.
Landel R; Kulig K; Fredericson M; Li B; Powers CM
Phys Ther; 2008 Jan; 88(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18029394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: reliability of qualitative evaluation of disc and muscle parameters.
Solgaard Sorensen J; Kjaer P; Jensen ST; Andersen P
Acta Radiol; 2006 Nov; 47(9):947-53. PubMed ID: 17077047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intra- and interexaminer reliability of the chiropractic biophysics lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure.
Troyanovich SJ; Robertson GA; Harrison DD; Holland B
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Oct; 18(8):519-24. PubMed ID: 8583174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Palpation of the upper thoracic spine: an observer reliability study.
Christensen HW; Vach W; Vach K; Manniche C; Haghfelt T; Hartvigsen L; Høilund-Carlsen PF
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Jun; 25(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 12072848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability in identifying and classifying degenerative marrow (Modic) changes on lumbar spine magnetic resonance scans.
Peterson CK; Gatterman B; Carter JC; Humphreys BK; Weibel A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Feb; 30(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 17320728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine.
Pool JJ; Hoving JL; de Vet HC; van Mameren H; Bouter LM
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Feb; 27(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 14970808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review.
Hestbaek L; Leboeuf-Yde C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 May; 23(4):258-75. PubMed ID: 10820299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of vertebral endplate signal (modic) changes in the lumbar spine: the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification.
Jensen TS; Sorensen JS; Kjaer P
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):748-54. PubMed ID: 17729006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spinal palpation for lumbar segmental mobility and pain provocation: an interexaminer reliability study.
Schneider M; Erhard R; Brach J; Tellin W; Imbarlina F; Delitto A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008; 31(6):465-73. PubMed ID: 18722203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
