These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26285444)

  • 1. [STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS: EVOLVING CHANGES ACCORDING TO PERSONALIZED MEDICINE].
    Ernest P; Jandrain B; Scheen AJ
    Rev Med Liege; 2015; 70(5-6):232-6. PubMed ID: 26285444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How can good randomized controlled trials in leading journals be so misinterpreted?
    Veith FJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 57(2 Suppl):3S-7S. PubMed ID: 23336854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controversies in acupuncture research: selection of controls and outcome measures in acupuncture clinical trials.
    Langevin HM; Hammerschlag R; Lao L; Napadow V; Schnyer RN; Sherman KJ
    J Altern Complement Med; 2006 Dec; 12(10):943-53. PubMed ID: 17212566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The quality of reports of randomized trials in multiple sclerosis: a review.
    Signori A; Baccino A; Sormani MP
    Mult Scler; 2012 Jun; 18(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 22495947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Redefining the randomized controlled trial in the context of acupuncture research.
    Walji R; Boon H
    Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2006 May; 12(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 16648085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations.
    Hannan EL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jun; 1(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 19463302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.
    Manchikanti L; Hirsch JA; Smith HS
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(6):717-73. PubMed ID: 19057624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
    Walker A; Nixon J
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From randomized trials to registry studies: translating data into clinical information.
    Brown ML; Gersh BJ; Holmes DR; Bailey KR; Sundt TM
    Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2008 Oct; 5(10):613-20. PubMed ID: 18679381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Randomised controlled trials: a reading guide].
    Perrier A
    Rev Mal Respir; 2002 Sep; 19(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 12417866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
    Atkins DC
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence: imprecision].
    Kulig M; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):677-88. PubMed ID: 23200212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine?
    Julian DG
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Suppl):S2-5. PubMed ID: 12950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mega-trials: methodological issues and clinical implications.
    Charlton BG
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1995; 29(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 7595900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
    Fujii Y
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):669-70; author reply 670. PubMed ID: 22512837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological issues and complementary therapies: researching intangibles?
    Carter B
    Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery; 2003 Aug; 9(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 12852929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Missing data in rheumatologic studies and the practical reality of modern approaches to the analysis of incomplete subject data: comment on the article by Baron et al and the editorial by Boers.
    Steele R; Hudson M
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Sep; 59(9):1367-8. PubMed ID: 18759312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.