These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2628645)
21. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Morgan R; Harty-Golder B Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients. Dippel DL Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Neurologic syndromes and prolonged survival: when can artificial nutrition and hydration be forgone? Cranford RE Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):13-22. PubMed ID: 1910128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Withholding treatment: a legal perspective. Ball JR J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Jul; 32(7):528-30. PubMed ID: 6736519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Guidelines for state court decision making in life-sustaining medical treatment cases. Hafemeister TL Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):443-75. PubMed ID: 1563938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1987 developments. National Legal Center Staff. Issues Law Med; 1988; 3(4):333-60. PubMed ID: 2967805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance. Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Helga Wanglie revisited: medical futility and the limits of autonomy. Johnson DH Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 8293205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health. Barton RS Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 1903782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Doctors, families and difficult decisions: the implications of the Lawrance case. Nocon JJ Indiana Med; 1991 Nov; 84(11):808-10. PubMed ID: 1761855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The long dying of Nancy Cruzan. Annas GJ Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):52-9. PubMed ID: 1910131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The lessons of Quinlan. Drane JF Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Minors, medical treatment, and interspousal disagreement: should Solomon split the child? Feigenbaum MS De Paul Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):841-84. PubMed ID: 11659593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Death by default. Lindgren J Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cruzan and the demands of due process. Haddad ME Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 1399496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis. Murphy JG Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The case of Mr. Stevens. Cranford RE Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment. Ferguson G Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Right-to-die issues in Minnesota. Klein JE Minn Med; 1991 Apr; 74(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 1875875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of the courts in terminating life-sustaining medical treatment. Leibson CM Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):437-51. PubMed ID: 7737849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]