138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26286486)
1. Do personalised e-mail invitations increase the response rates of breast cancer survivors invited to participate in a web-based behaviour change intervention? A quasi-randomised 2-arm controlled trial.
Short CE; Rebar AL; Vandelanotte C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():66. PubMed ID: 26286486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. African-American breast cancer survivors' preferences for various types of physical activity interventions: a Sisters Network Inc. web-based survey.
Paxton RJ; Nayak P; Taylor WC; Chang S; Courneya KS; Schover L; Hodges K; Jones LA
J Cancer Surviv; 2014 Mar; 8(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 24043292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Erratum to: Do personalised e-mail invitations increase the response rates of breast cancer survivors invited to participate in a web-based behaviour change intervention? A quasi-randomised 2-arm controlled trial.
Short CE; Rebar AL; Vandelanotte C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Nov; 15():102. PubMed ID: 26589396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches.
Sinclair M; O'Toole J; Malawaraarachchi M; Leder K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():132. PubMed ID: 22938205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of personalised versus non-personalised study invitations on recruitment within the ENGAGE feasibility trial: an embedded randomised controlled recruitment trial.
Thiblin E; Woodford J; Öhman M; von Essen L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):65. PubMed ID: 35249543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based email intervention designed to influence the physical activity of survivors of breast cancer.
Hatchett A; Hallam JS; Ford MA
Psychooncology; 2013 Apr; 22(4):829-36. PubMed ID: 22573338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using web-based and paper-based questionnaires for collecting data on fertility issues among female childhood cancer survivors: differences in response characteristics.
van den Berg MH; Overbeek A; van der Pal HJ; Versluys AB; Bresters D; van Leeuwen FE; Lambalk CB; Kaspers GJ; van Dulmen-den Broeder E
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e76. PubMed ID: 21955527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cost-effective approach to increasing participation in patient-reported outcomes research in cancer: A randomized trial of video invitations.
Signorelli C; Wakefield CE; McLoone JK; Mateos MK; Aaronson NK; Lavoipierre A; Cohn RJ;
Int J Cancer; 2021 Feb; 148(4):971-980. PubMed ID: 32748404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.
Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the Efficacy of an Identical, Tailored Smoking Cessation Intervention Delivered by Mobile Text Messaging Versus Email: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gram IT; Larbi D; Wangberg SC
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Sep; 7(9):e12137. PubMed ID: 31573935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Recruitment Methods on Response Rate in a Web-Based Study for Primary Care Physicians: Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.
So R; Shinohara K; Aoki T; Tsujimoto Y; Suganuma AM; Furukawa TA
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Feb; 20(2):e28. PubMed ID: 29422450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strategies to increase survey participation: A randomized controlled study in a population of breast cancer survivors.
Spoor J; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Oldenburg HSA; Bleiker EMA; van Leeuwen FE
Ann Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 94():1-8. PubMed ID: 38609024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.
Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial.
Koitsalu M; Eklund M; Adolfsson J; Grönberg H; Brandberg Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 29304734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.
Dokkum NF; Koekenbier RH; van den Broek IV; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema JS; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; Op de Coul EL
BMC Public Health; 2012 Mar; 12():176. PubMed ID: 22404911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.
Murphy CC; Craddock Lee SJ; Geiger AM; Cox JV; Ahn C; Nair R; Gerber DE; Halm EA; McCallister K; Skinner CS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):123. PubMed ID: 32429848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lessons learnt during the implementation of a web-based triage tool for Dutch intensive care follow-up clinics.
van Beusekom I; Bakhshi-Raiez F; de Keizer NF; Dongelmans DA; van der Schaaf M
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021249. PubMed ID: 30249628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internet trials: participant experiences and perspectives.
Mathieu E; Barratt A; Carter SM; Jamtvedt G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Oct; 12():162. PubMed ID: 23092116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing targeted invitation and response modes to improve survey participation in a diverse New York City panel: Healthy NYC.
Dasgupta S; Perlman SE; Levanon Seligson A; Dumas SE; Seil K; Bholanath T
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280911. PubMed ID: 36701347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations.
Gidlow CJ; Ellis NJ; Riley V; Chadborn T; Bunten A; Iqbal Z; Ahmed A; Fisher A; Sugden D; Clark-Carter D
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):224. PubMed ID: 30791884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
