These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26286681)
21. The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension. Tily H; Fedorenko E; Gibson E Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):910-27. PubMed ID: 19746299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A framework for modeling the interaction of syntactic processing and eye movement control. Engelmann F; Vasishth S; Engbert R; Kliegl R Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):452-74. PubMed ID: 23681560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantifying Structural and Non-structural Expectations in Relative Clause Processing. Chen Z; Hale JT Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 45(1):e12927. PubMed ID: 33415796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dependency Resolution Difficulty Increases with Distance in Persian Separable Complex Predicates: Evidence for Expectation and Memory-Based Accounts. Safavi MS; Husain S; Vasishth S Front Psychol; 2016; 7():403. PubMed ID: 27064660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of Expectation and Working Memory Constraints in Hindi Comprehension: An Eye-tracking Corpus Analysis. Agrawal A; Agarwal S; Husain S J Eye Mov Res; 2017 Apr; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33828649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Rational Model of Incremental Argument Interpretation: The Comprehension of Swedish Transitive Clauses. Hörberg T; Jaeger TF Front Psychol; 2021; 12():674202. PubMed ID: 34721134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Information entropy facilitates (not impedes) lexical processing during language comprehension. Karimi H; Weber P; Zinn J Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38361106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. Staub A; Clifton C J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):425-36. PubMed ID: 16569157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of Verb Bias and Syntactic Ambiguity on Reading in People with Aphasia. Dede G Aphasiology; 2013 Oct; 27(10-12):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 24683286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spanish-English L2 speakers' use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Dussias PE; Cramer Scaltz TR Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jul; 128(3):501-13. PubMed ID: 18001689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Structural priming in sentence comprehension: A single prime is enough. Giavazzi M; Sambin S; de Diego-Balaguer R; Le Stanc L; Bachoud-Lévi AC; Jacquemot C PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194959. PubMed ID: 29608612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of individual differences in text exposure on sentence comprehension. Stoops A; Montag JL Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16812. PubMed ID: 37798346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Syntactic priming without lexical overlap in reading comprehension. Kim CS; Carbary KM; Tanenhaus MK Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):181-95. PubMed ID: 25102605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Individual differences in sentence comprehension: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of syntactic and lexical processing demands. Prat CS; Keller TA; Just MA J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1950-63. PubMed ID: 17892384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences. Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension. Brothers T; Kuperberg GR J Mem Lang; 2021 Feb; 116():. PubMed ID: 33100508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm. Brothers T; Traxler MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1894-1906. PubMed ID: 27123753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Locality and expectation effects in Hindi preverbal constituent ordering. Ranjan S; Rajkumar R; Agarwal S Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():104959. PubMed ID: 35091261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty. van Schijndel M; Linzen T Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12988. PubMed ID: 34170031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]