706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26287324)
1. [The DIEP Flap as Method of Choice in Breast Reconstruction - Results and Protocol for Succesful Reconstruction].
Otte M; Andree C; Hagouan M; Richrath P; Abu-Ghazaleh A; Munder B
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2015 Aug; 47(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 26287324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Is there a psychological and physiological difference between DIEP- and free TRAM-flap? A retrospective patient survey].
Wurzer P; Spendel S; Kamolz LP; Parvizi D; Tuca A; Rappl T
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Aug; 46(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 25162244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.
Damen TH; Morritt AN; Zhong T; Ahmad J; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Myosonographic study of abdominal wall dynamics to assess donor site morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction with a DIEP or an ms-2 TRAM flap.
Seidenstuecker K; Legler U; Munder B; Andree C; Mahajan A; Witzel C
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 May; 69(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 27049776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cracking the perfusion code?: Laser-assisted Indocyanine Green angiography and combined laser Doppler spectrophotometry for intraoperative evaluation of tissue perfusion in autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP or ms-TRAM flaps.
Ludolph I; Arkudas A; Schmitz M; Boos AM; Taeger CD; Rother U; Horch RE; Beier JP
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Oct; 69(10):1382-8. PubMed ID: 27522453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Significance of abdominal wall CT-angiography in planning DIEA perforator flaps, TRAM flaps and SIEA flaps].
Fansa H; Schirmer S; Frerichs O; Gehl HB
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2011 Apr; 43(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 20821365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Bajaj AK; Chevray PM; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Mar; 117(3):737-46; discussion 747-50. PubMed ID: 16525258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved safety of autologous breast reconstruction surgery by stabilisation of microsurgical vessel anastomoses using fibrin sealant in 349 free DIEP or fascia-muscle-sparing (fms)-TRAM flaps: a two-centre study.
Andree C; Munder BI; Behrendt P; Hellmann S; Audretsch W; Voigt M; Reis C; Beckmann MW; Horch RE; Bach AD
Breast; 2008 Oct; 17(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 18502642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction.
Wang XL; Liu LB; Song FM; Wang QY
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Aug; 38(4):681-91. PubMed ID: 24902911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Knight MA; Nguyen DT; Kobayashi MR; Evans GR
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jun; 56(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 16721068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The extended diep flap: extending the possibilities for breast reconstruction with tissue from the lower abdomen.
Shafighi M; Constantinescu MA; Huemer GM; Olariu R; Bonel HM; Banic A; Ramakrishnan V
Microsurgery; 2013 Jan; 33(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 22438209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.
Garvey PB; Clemens MW; Hoy AE; Smith B; Zhang H; Kronowitz SJ; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 24469158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
