188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26287958)
1. Approximate confidence intervals for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis.
Jackson D; Bowden J; Baker R
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Dec; 6(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 26287958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shortcomings of an approximate confidence interval for moment-based estimators of the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis.
Hoaglin DC
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):459-461. PubMed ID: 27231158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Methods for calculating confidence and credible intervals for the residual between-study variance in random effects meta-regression models.
Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Sep; 14():103. PubMed ID: 25196829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multistep estimators of the between-study variance: The relationship with the Paule-Mandel estimator.
van Aert RCM; Jackson D
Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(17):2616-2629. PubMed ID: 29700839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statistics.
Jackson D
Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 26053842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?
Jackson D; Bowden J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 27604952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
Sidik K; Jonkman JN
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved Fisher z estimators for univariate random-effects meta-analysis of correlations.
Hafdahl AR
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):233-61. PubMed ID: 18257972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of methods for meta-analysis of a small number of studies with binary outcomes.
Mathes T; Kuss O
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):366-381. PubMed ID: 29573180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
Partlett C; Riley RD
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
Preuß M; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
Westgate PM
Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies.
Michael H; Thornton S; Xie M; Tian L
Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30430540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
Langan D; Higgins JPT; Simmonds M
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):181-198. PubMed ID: 27060925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
