These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26288063)
1. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach. Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Munn Z; Moola S; Lisy K; Riitano D; Tufanaru C Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 26317388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility? Anderson R Health Econ; 2010 Mar; 19(3):350-64. PubMed ID: 19378354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews. Pearson A; White H; Bath-Hextall F; Salmond S; Apostolo J; Kirkpatrick P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 26196082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance. Robinson KA; Chou R; Berkman ND; Newberry SJ; Fu R; Hartling L; Dryden D; Butler M; Foisy M; Anderson J; Motu'apuaka M; Relevo R; Guise JM; Chang S J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():38-44. PubMed ID: 26261004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development. Claxton K; Palmer S; Longworth L; Bojke L; Griffin S; McKenna C; Soares M; Spackman E; Youn J Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(46):1-323. PubMed ID: 23177626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]