These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2628854)
101. [Determination of audiometric zero point for air and bone conductivity in extended range of high frequency]. Gierek T Otolaryngol Pol; 1979; 33(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 460887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
105. Comparison of studies on bone conduction thresholds and the HAIC interim standard for bone conduction audiometry. Olsen WO J Speech Hear Disord; 1969 Feb; 34(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 5765862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
106. Audiometric Variability of the Carhart Effect in Middle Ear Diseases - Pretreatment Analysis. Szpak K; Wiatr A; Wiatr M Ear Nose Throat J; 2023 Apr; ():1455613231167243. PubMed ID: 37046387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
107. Clinical experience and experimental findings with sodium fluoride in otosclerosis (otospongiosis). Causse J; Chevance LG; Shambaugh GE Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1974; 83(5):643-7. PubMed ID: 4412470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
108. [Assessment of intraindividual and interindividual variability in the determination of bone conduction in tone audiometry]. Gierek T; Blaszczyńska M Otolaryngol Pol; 1975; 29(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 1143894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
109. Audiometric zero for air conduction. A verification and critique of international standards. Robinson DW; Shipton MS; Hinchcliffe R Audiology; 1981; 20(5):409-31. PubMed ID: 7271593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
110. Physical and physiological constraints on the use of bone-conduction speech audiometry. Barry SJ; Gaddis S J Speech Hear Disord; 1978 May; 43(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 661260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
111. Bone conduction thresholds for normal listeners in force and acceleration units. Dirks DD; Kamm C; Gilman S J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Mar; 19(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 1271796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
112. Clinical findings with SAL audiometry: some further observations. Lynn GE; Willeford JA J Speech Hear Disord; 1965 Nov; 30(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 5835490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
113. Transcranial attenuation in bone conduction audiometry. Nolan M; Lyon DJ J Laryngol Otol; 1981 Jun; 95(6):597-608. PubMed ID: 7252337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
114. The classification of audiograms in otosclerosis. Preliminary report. Marres EH; Huygen PL; Brand OW ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1973; 35(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 4795595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
116. Experiences with SAL audiometry. Révész G J Laryngol Otol; 1970 May; 84(5):515-9. PubMed ID: 5428059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
117. The effect of coupling force on bone conduction audiometry. Lau CC Br J Audiol; 1986 Nov; 20(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 3790771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
118. Clinical bone-conduction audiometry; the use of a frontally applied bone-conduction receiver and the importance of the occlusion effect in clinical bone-conduction audiometry. NAUNTON RF AMA Arch Otolaryngol; 1957 Sep; 66(3):281-98. PubMed ID: 13457562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
119. The diagnostic value of Gellé's test. Dankbaar WA Acta Otolaryngol; 1970 Apr; 69(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 5445959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
120. Changes in bone conduction thresholds with vibrator contact area. Queller JE; Khanna SM J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jun; 71(6):1519-26. PubMed ID: 7108027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]