These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26288620)

  • 1. Accuracy of different impression materials in parallel and nonparallel implants.
    Vojdani M; Torabi K; Ansarifard E
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 26288620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of the effect of impression materials and trays on the accuracy of angulated implants impressions.
    Siadat H; Saeidi Z; Alikhasi M; Zeighami S
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Nov; 10(11):e1096-e1102. PubMed ID: 30607227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.
    Ebadian B; Rismanchian M; Dastgheib B; Bajoghli F
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 25878678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
    Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ozan O; Ozcelik TB; Yagiz A
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Accuracy/Dimensional Stability of High-Rigid Vinyl Polysiloxane, Polyvinyl Siloxane, and Polyether Impression Materials in Full Arch Implant-Supported Prosthesis: In Vitro Study.
    Kurella KS; Thiyaneswaran N; Abhinav RP
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2020; 30(3):179-186. PubMed ID: 33463965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials.
    De La Cruz JE; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Moss ME; Graser GN; Tallents RH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 12426505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants.
    Nakhaei M; Madani AS; Moraditalab A; Haghi HR
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 26604956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ; Pesun IJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of implant connection length on the dimensional impression accuracy of inclined implants.
    Ehsani S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):e315-20. PubMed ID: 24278936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of vinyl polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials in direct implant impression technique for multiple dental implants.
    Rajendran R; Chander NG; Anitha KV; Muthukumar B
    Eur Oral Res; 2021 May; 55(2):54-59. PubMed ID: 34250470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of dental implant angulation on the dimensional accuracy of master casts.
    Barjini N; Sayahpour S; Jafari M
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):473-482. PubMed ID: 34994115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study.
    Schmidt A; Häussling T; Rehmann P; Schaaf H; Wöstmann B
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29191609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.