These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26288897)

  • 1. Adapting the Crossmodal Congruency Task for Measuring the Limits of Visual-Tactile Interactions Within and Between Groups.
    Poole D; Couth S; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):227-44. PubMed ID: 26288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empathy as a predictor of peripersonal space: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Gherri E; Theocharopoulos M; Browne N; Duran N; Austin EJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Feb; 98():103267. PubMed ID: 34998269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Kitagawa N; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 161(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 15688177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: how vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand.
    Schicke T; Bauer F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 192(4):703-15. PubMed ID: 18841353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kimura Y; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of spatial consistency and individual difference on touch-induced visual suppression effect.
    Hidaka S; Suzuishi Y; Ide M; Wada M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17018. PubMed ID: 30451910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?
    Chen S; Shi Z; Zang X; Zhu X; Assumpção L; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1682-1694. PubMed ID: 31845105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the spatial and temporal modulation of visuotactile interactions in older adults.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1233-48. PubMed ID: 26449968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
    Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Seeing an image of the hand affects performance on a crossmodal congruency task for sequences of events.
    O' Dowd A; Sorgini F; Newell FN
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102900. PubMed ID: 32114256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potential evidence for a dynamic (re-)weighting of somatotopic and external coordinates of touch during visual-tactile interactions.
    Ley P; Steinberg U; Hanganu-Opatz IL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 May; 41(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 25879770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Maravita A; Holmes N
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):171-89. PubMed ID: 15477031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tool use modulates early stages of visuo-tactile integration in far space: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Forsberg A; O'Dowd A; Gherri E
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Jul; 145():42-54. PubMed ID: 30970269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual-tactile selective attention in autism spectrum condition: An increased influence of visual distractors.
    Poole D; Gowen E; Warren PA; Poliakoff E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 29963887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.
    Aspell JE; Lavanchy T; Lenggenhager B; Blanke O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1868-73. PubMed ID: 20584191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
    Holmes NP; Sanabria D; Calvert GA; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1077(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16483553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.