477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26288905)
1. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
Wahn B; König P
Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audition and vision share spatial attentional resources, yet attentional load does not disrupt audiovisual integration.
Wahn B; König P
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1084. PubMed ID: 26284008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attentional Resource Allocation in Visuotactile Processing Depends on the Task, But Optimal Visuotactile Integration Does Not Depend on Attentional Resources.
Wahn B; König P
Front Integr Neurosci; 2016; 10():13. PubMed ID: 27013994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
Jones A; Forster B
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shared or Distinct Attentional Resources? Confounds in Dual Task Designs, Countermeasures, and Guidelines.
Wahn B; Sinnett S
Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(2):145-163. PubMed ID: 31059470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
Sambo CF; Forster B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of mental workload on involuntary attention: A somatosensory ERP study.
Mun S; Whang M; Park S; Park MC
Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():7-20. PubMed ID: 28827155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus.
Alnæs D; Sneve MH; Espeseth T; Endestad T; van de Pavert SH; Laeng B
J Vis; 2014 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 24692319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory Stimulus Detection Partially Depends on Visuospatial Attentional Resources.
Wahn B; Murali S; Sinnett S; König P
Iperception; 2017; 8(1):2041669516688026. PubMed ID: 28203353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.
Helbig HB; Ernst MO
J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):21.1-16. PubMed ID: 18318624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of cross-sensory attentional demand on subitizing and on mapping number onto space.
Anobile G; Turi M; Cicchini GM; Burr DC
Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():102-9. PubMed ID: 22727938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of perceptual load on tactile spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
Gherri E; Berreby F
Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 1673():42-51. PubMed ID: 28803830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Common mechanisms of spatial attention in memory and perception: a tactile dual-task study.
Katus T; Andersen SK; Müller MM
Cereb Cortex; 2014 Mar; 24(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 23172773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
Rau PP; Zheng J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-Modal Attention Effects in the Vestibular Cortex during Attentive Tracking of Moving Objects.
Frank SM; Sun L; Forster L; Tse PU; Greenlee MW
J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(50):12720-12728. PubMed ID: 27821579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
Holmes NP; Spence C; Hansen PC; Mackay CE; Calvert GA
PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3502. PubMed ID: 18958150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pupil dilation reveals top-down attentional load during spatial monitoring.
Lisi M; Bonato M; Zorzi M
Biol Psychol; 2015 Dec; 112():39-45. PubMed ID: 26472280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
