560 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26288990)
1. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping in gynecologic oncology.
Wisner KPA; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 45():83-93. PubMed ID: 28533155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Laparoscopic ways of para-aortic lymphadenectomy].
Estrade JP; Lazard A; Gurriet B; Agostini A; Blanc B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Feb; 38(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 20122863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of laparoscopy in staging of different gynaecological cancers.
Tse KY; Ngan HY
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 25819676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure.
Franké O; Narducci F; Chereau-Ewald E; Orsoni M; Jauffret C; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 25514349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature.
Possover M; Krause N; Plaul K; Kühne-Heid R; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 9784314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (TIPAL).
Coronado PJ; Fasero M; Magrina JF; Herraiz MA; Vidart JA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 24486680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Technique and surgical outcomes.
Doğan Durdağ G; Alemdaroğlu S; Yılmaz Baran Ş; Alkaş Yağınç D; Yüksel Şimşek S; Çelik H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 50(5):101917. PubMed ID: 32961327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current status of operative laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.
Childers JM; Surwit EA
Oncology (Williston Park); 1993 Nov; 7(11):47-51; discussion 53-4, 57. PubMed ID: 8280577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic laparoendoscopic single site radical hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer.
Sinno AK; Tanner EJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):387. PubMed ID: 26307401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic high para-aortic lymph node dissection with high port placement using same port for pelvic surgery in gynecologic cancer patients.
Kim TJ; Yoon G; Lee YY; Choi CH; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 26197858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy.
Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extraperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy.
da Costa AG; Borghesi Y; Hudry D; Faes J; Bresson L; Narducci F; Leblanc E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):861-866. PubMed ID: 29337211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Staging laparotomy in gynecologic cancer].
Tsukamoto N
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):1009-14. PubMed ID: 2681452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymph node excision--initial experiences and development of a technique].
Schneider A; Krause N; Kühne-Heid R; Kamprath S; Endisch U; Merker A; Nöschel H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(9):498-504. PubMed ID: 8992817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comprehensive Staging of Uterine Carcinosarcoma Using a Multiquadrant Robotic Platform.
Dellinger TH; Wakabayashi MT; Han ES
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):531-532. PubMed ID: 27794476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies.
Köhler C; Klemm P; Schau A; Possover M; Krause N; Tozzi R; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 15385110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]