These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26289350)

  • 1. Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetland Reserve Program in Texas: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Stroman D; Kreuter UP
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 26289350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.
    Stroman DA; Kreuter UP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():284-291. PubMed ID: 25190596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Landowner satisfaction with the Wetlands Reserve Program in Wisconsin.
    Forshay K; Morzaria-Luna HN; Hale B; Predick K
    Environ Manage; 2005 Aug; 36(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15995886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the success of hydrological restoration in two conservation easements within Central Florida ranchland.
    Sonnier G; Bohlen PJ; Swain HM; Orzell SL; Bridges EL; Boughton EH
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199333. PubMed ID: 29969464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
    Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Landowners' incentives for constructing wetlands in an agricultural area in south Sweden.
    Hansson A; Pedersen E; Weisner SE
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():271-8. PubMed ID: 23064246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage?
    Armstrong A; Stedman RC
    Environ Manage; 2020 May; 65(5):689-701. PubMed ID: 32086548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Land management restrictions and options for change in perpetual conservation easements.
    Rissman A; Bihari M; Hamilton C; Locke C; Lowenstein D; Motew M; Price J; Smail R
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 52(1):277-88. PubMed ID: 23784713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
    Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motivations influencing the adoption of conservation easements.
    Farmer JR; Knapp D; Meretsky VJ; Chancellor C; Fischer BC
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 21535148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social and spatial relationships driving landowner attitudes towards aquatic conservation in a Piedmont-Blue Ridge landscape.
    Chambers SN; Baldwin RF; Baldwin ED; Bridges WC; Fouch N
    Heliyon; 2017 Apr; 3(4):e00288. PubMed ID: 28409186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
    Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Socio-psychological factors influencing intent to adopt conservation practices in the Minnesota River Basin.
    Lang Z; Rabotyagov S
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 307():114466. PubMed ID: 35078060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land.
    Yasué M; Kirkpatrick JB; Davison A; Gilfedder L
    Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 31359092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landowner preferences for wetlands conservation programs in two Southern Ontario watersheds.
    Trenholm R; Haider W; Lantz V; Knowler D; Haegeli P
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Sep; 200():6-21. PubMed ID: 28549304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are incentive programs working? Landowner attitudes to ecological restoration of agricultural landscapes.
    Jellinek S; Parris KM; Driscoll DA; Dwyer PD
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():69-76. PubMed ID: 23685119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.