These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2628941)

  • 21. Relationship between gap width and recurrent dental caries beneath occlusal margins of amalgam restorations.
    Hodges DJ; Mangum FI; Ward MT
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 23(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 7587139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long term sealing properties of Amalgambond under amalgam restorations.
    Ben-Amar A; Liberman R; Rothkoff Z; Cardash HS
    Am J Dent; 1994 Jun; 7(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 7993602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Histological features of artificial secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations.
    Grossman ES; Matejka JM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Sep; 26(9):737-44. PubMed ID: 10520149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of topical fluoride application before and after amalgam restoration placement on recurrent caries inhibition.
    Donly KJ; Stufflebeam M; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):151-3. PubMed ID: 10388367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Observations on a calcium hydroxide lining in retrieved deciduous teeth, with proximal amalgam fillings.
    Grajower R; Bielak S; Eidelman E
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Nov; 11(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 6595382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prevalence and incidence of caries lesions in relation to placement and replacement of fillings: a longitudinal observational radiographic study of an adult Danish population.
    Kirkevang LL; Vaeth M; Wenzel A
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 19439950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors associated with amalgam restorations in Taiwan.
    Hu SW; Yang LC; Chang HY
    Br Dent J; 2002 Oct; 193(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 12420015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inhibition in vitro of caries around amalgam restorations by bonding amalgam to tooth structure.
    Torii Y; Staninec M; Kawakami M; Imazato S; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    Oper Dent; 1989; 14(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 2700384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: a methodological study.
    Mjör IA; Reep RL; Kubilis PS; Mondragón BE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 9863449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Amalgam restorations: postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 10823088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Caries recurrence at the margin of silver amalgam restorations].
    Poggio C; Lanati C
    Dent Cadmos; 1984 Jun; 52(6):49-52. PubMed ID: 6596222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The clinical history of 402 teeth with Class II amalgam restorations.
    Reuter JE
    Restorative Dent; 1985 Jan; 1(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 3857696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Composite or amalgam? Not a black or white decision].
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Oct; 99(10):371-4. PubMed ID: 11820006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls.
    de Morais PM; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.
    Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.