175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2628947)
21. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vitro antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements.
Herrera M; Carrión P; Baca P; Liébana J; Castillo A
Microbios; 2001; 104(409):141-8. PubMed ID: 11327108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Growth inhibition of glass ionomer cements on mutans streptococci.
Loyola-Rodriguez JP; Garcia-Godoy F; Lindquist R
Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 7831139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
Mjör IA
Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
Vaikuntam J
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An evaluation of glass ionomer-based restorative materials as temporary restorations in endodontics.
Seiler KB
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 16494118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Marginal sealing ability of four restorative materials placed in root surfaces.
Chan MF; Jones JC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8180614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Pulp tolerance of glass-ionomer and zinc oxide-phosphate cements].
Schmalz G; Schmalz C; Rotgans J
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1986 Sep; 41(9):806-12. PubMed ID: 3465519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Ertuğrul F; Eltem R; Eronat C
J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Replacement of defective Class I amalgam restorations with stratified glass ionomer-composite resin materials.
Croll TP
Quintessence Int; 1989 Oct; 20(10):711-6. PubMed ID: 2639386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of the effects of two kinds of glass-ionomer cement on human gingival fibroblast attachment, proliferation and morphology in vitro.
Yan F; Xiao Y; Li H; Haase H; Bartold PM
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2000 Jan; 2(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 12666981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
Donly KJ; Wild T; Jensen ME
Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of candida albicans biofilm formation on various dental restorative material surfaces.
Beldüz N; Kamburoğlu A; Yılmaz Y; Tosun I; Beldüz M; Kara C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Mar; 20(3):355-360. PubMed ID: 28256492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Antibacterial activity of dental restorative materials.
Tobias RS; Browne RM; Wilson CA
Int Endod J; 1985 Jul; 18(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 3861587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cytotoxic effects of restorative materials on early passage cultured cells derived from human gingiva (in vitro)].
Yamagata N; Oshima H
Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Jul; 9(4):541-54. PubMed ID: 2134820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm.
Auschill TM; Arweiler NB; Brecx M; Reich E; Sculean A; Netuschil L
Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Feb; 110(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 11878760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
