These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Antimicrobial properties of conventional restorative filling materials and advances in antimicrobial properties of composite resins and glass ionomer cements-A literature review. Farrugia C; Camilleri J Dent Mater; 2015 Apr; 31(4):e89-99. PubMed ID: 25582060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Restorative materials. Holmstrom SE J Vet Dent; 1991 Mar; 8(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 1930734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. Prati C; Fava F; Di Gioia D; Selighini M; Pashley DH Dent Mater; 1993 Nov; 9(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 7988764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer restorative cements and polyacid modified composite resin against cariogenic bacteria. Menon T; Kumar CP; Dinesh K Indian J Med Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 24(2):150-1. PubMed ID: 16687876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Cytotoxic effects of dental cements on two cell culture systems. Hanks CT; Anderson M; Craig RG J Oral Pathol; 1981 Apr; 10(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 6792331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Glass-ionomer cement as retrograde filling material. An experimental investigation in monkeys. Zetterqvist L; Anneroth G; Nordenram A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Aug; 16(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 3117920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Antibacterial effects of several current orthodontic materials against Streptococcus mutans. Catalbaş B; Kamak H; Demir A; Nur M; Hadimli HH West Indian Med J; 2012 Nov; 61(8):821-5. PubMed ID: 23757904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Antimicrobial effects of dental luting glass ionomer cements on Streptococcus mutans. Klai S; Altenburger M; Spitzmüller B; Anderson A; Hellwig E; Al-Ahmad A ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():807086. PubMed ID: 24795539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Effect of a glass ionomer cement on the pH of saliva and on phenol-indole production by salivary microorganisms]. Yasuda A Shigaku; 1986 Oct; 74(4):858-73. PubMed ID: 3467280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Dental materials: 1978 literature review. Part I. Brown D; Braden M; Causton BE; Combe EC; Cruickshanks-Boyd DW; Lloyd CH; Main C; McCabe JF; Miller M; Tranter TC; Waters NE; Watts DC; Williams DF; Wilson AD; Wilson HJ J Dent; 1980 Sep; 8(3):189-221. PubMed ID: 7002966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The development of fracture toughness and fracture strength in posterior restorative materials. Lloyd CH; Adamson M Dent Mater; 1987 Oct; 3(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 3479357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Antibacterial effects of light-cured liners. DeSchepper EJ; Thrasher MR; Thurmond BA Am J Dent; 1989 Jun; 2(3):74-6. PubMed ID: 2604964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Pulpal responses to ionomer cements--biological characteristics. Stanley HR J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2404040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Tissue response to a glass ionomer used as an endodontic cement. A preliminary study in dogs. Zmener O; Dominguez FV Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Aug; 56(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 6578483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Biocompatibility of the glass ionomer cement. Wilson AD; Prosser HJ J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1982 Dec; 37(12):872-9. PubMed ID: 6964199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of restorative materials combined with chlorhexidines. Jedrychowski JR; Caputo AA; Kerper S J Oral Rehabil; 1983 Sep; 10(5):373-81. PubMed ID: 6355413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]