288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26289747)
1. Logical Inconsistencies in 3 Preference Elicitation Methods for EQ-5D Health States: A Study in the Brazilian Population.
Andrade MV; Noronha K; Kind P; Reis Cde B; de Carvalho LR
Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):242-52. PubMed ID: 26289747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states.
Lamers LM; Stalmeier PF; Krabbe PF; Busschbach JJ
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16525171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states.
Badia X; Roset M; Herdman M
Soc Sci Med; 1999 Oct; 49(7):943-50. PubMed ID: 10468398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Brazilian Valuation of EQ-5D-3L Health States: Results from a Saturation Study.
Santos M; Cintra MA; Monteiro AL; Santos B; Gusmão-Filho F; Andrade MV; Noronha K; Cruz LN; Camey S; Tura B; Kind P
Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 26492896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Rand-Hendriksen K; Pinto-Prades JL
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 27325340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health literacy and logical inconsistencies in valuations of hypothetical health states: results from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.
Al Sayah F; Johnson JA; Ohinmaa A; Xie F; Bansback N;
Qual Life Res; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1483-1492. PubMed ID: 28124280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Logical inconsistencies in time trade-off valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states: Whose fault is it?
Yang Z; van Busschbach J; Timman R; Janssen MF; Luo N
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184883. PubMed ID: 28934266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EQ-5D Brazilian population norms.
Santos M; Monteiro AL; Santos B
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Jun; 19(1):162. PubMed ID: 34112207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.
Ludwig K; von der Schulenburg JG; Greiner W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 28219389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Societal Preferences for EQ-5D Health States from a Brazilian Population Survey.
Viegas Andrade M; Noronha K; Kind P; Maia AC; Miranda de Menezes R; De Barros Reis C; Nepomuceno Souza M; Martins D; Gomes L; Nichele D; Calazans J; Mascarenhas T; Carvalho L; Lins C
Value Health Reg Issues; 2013 Dec; 2(3):405-412. PubMed ID: 29702778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong.
Wong ELY; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cheung AWL; Wong AYK; Rivero-Arias O
Patient; 2018 Apr; 11(2):235-247. PubMed ID: 29019161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating an EQ-5D value set for Malaysia using time trade-off and visual analogue scale methods.
Yusof FA; Goh A; Azmi S
Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S85-90. PubMed ID: 22265073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time trade-off and ranking exercises are sensitive to different dimensions of EQ-5D health states.
Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA
Value Health; 2012; 15(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 22867789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.
Sayah FA; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Pullenayegum E; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1679-85. PubMed ID: 26659899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality-of-life valuations of advanced breast cancer by New Zealand women.
Milne RJ; Heaton-Brown KH; Hansen P; Thomas D; Harvey V; Cubitt A
Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 16519549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Valuing health states: is the MACBETH approach useful for valuing EQ-5D-3L health states?
Oliveira MD; Agostinho A; Ferreira L; Nicola P; Bana E Costa C
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Dec; 16(1):235. PubMed ID: 30563525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states.
Burström K; Sun S; Gerdtham UG; Henriksson M; Johannesson M; Levin LÅ; Zethraeus N
Qual Life Res; 2014 Mar; 23(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 23975375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EQ-5D-3L as a health measure of Brazilian adult population.
Menezes Rde M; Andrade MV; Noronha KV; Kind P
Qual Life Res; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2761-76. PubMed ID: 25896666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off.
Jiang R; Shaw J; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 33247810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
