BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26289927)

  • 1. Routine use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as standard approach for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Clinical experience of 1763 prenatal cases.
    Papoulidis I; Sotiriadis A; Siomou E; Papageorgiou E; Eleftheriades M; Papadopoulos V; Oikonomidou E; Orru S; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2015 Dec; 35(13):1269-77. PubMed ID: 26289927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.
    Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases.
    Scott F; Murphy K; Carey L; Greville W; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 23401365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal setting.
    Lovrecic L; Remec ZI; Volk M; Rudolf G; Writzl K; Peterlin B
    BMC Med Genet; 2016 Nov; 17(1):81. PubMed ID: 27846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test.
    Carey L; Scott F; Murphy K; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Leigh D; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Prenat Diagn; 2014 May; 34(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 24453008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Resolution Level and Targeted Design in the Diagnostic Performance of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis.
    Papageorgiou E; Athanasiadis A; Fidani S; Papoulidis I; Manolakos E; Siomou E; Chatzakis C; Sotiriadis A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2023; 50(6):397-405. PubMed ID: 37549642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prenatal diagnosis: array comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with abnormal sonographic findings.
    Vestergaard EM; Christensen R; Petersen OB; Vogel I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 23590624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dilemmas in Prenatal Chromosomal Diagnosis Revealed Through a Single Center's 30 Years' Experience and 90,000 Cases.
    Konialis C; Pangalos C
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2015; 38(3):218-32. PubMed ID: 25659342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal microarray comparative genomic hybridization: Experience from the two first years of activity at the Lyon university-hospital.
    Pons L; Till M; Alix E; Abel C; Boggio D; Bordes A; Caloone J; Raskin FC; Chatron N; Cordier MP; Fichez A; Labalme A; Lajeunesse C; Liaras É; Massoud M; Miribel J; Ollagnon E; Schluth-Bolard C; Vichier-Cerf A; Edery P; Attia J; Huissoud C; Rudigoz RC; Massardier J; Gaucherand P; Sanlaville D
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 46(3):275-283. PubMed ID: 28403926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
    Rosenfeld JA; Tucker ME; Escobar LF; Neill NJ; Torchia BS; McDaniel LD; Schultz RA; Chong K; Chitayat D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25846569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype.
    Leung TY; Vogel I; Lau TK; Chong W; Hyett JA; Petersen OB; Choy KW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 38(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 21400624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with congenital heart disease.
    Yan Y; Wu Q; Zhang L; Wang X; Dan S; Deng D; Sun L; Yao L; Ma Y; Wang L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24323407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Contribution of array CGH in the management of fetal nuchal translucency].
    Beal J; Jedraszak G; Saliou AH; Copin H; Sergent F; Gondry J; Merviel P; Muszynski C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Feb; 48(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 31634590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prenatal diagnosis using array-CGH: a French experience.
    Rooryck C; Toutain J; Cailley D; Bouron J; Horovitz J; Lacombe D; Arveiler B; Saura R
    Eur J Med Genet; 2013 Jul; 56(7):341-5. PubMed ID: 23454632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jansen FA; Blumenfeld YJ; Fisher A; Cobben JM; Odibo AO; Borrell A; Haak MC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 25319878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prenatal diagnosis and array comparative genomic hybridization characterization of trisomy 21 in a fetus associated with right congenital diaphragmatic hernia and a review of the literature of chromosomal abnormalities associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
    Chen CP; Wang YL; Chern SR; Liu YP; Peng CR; Kuo YL; Wu PS; Chen WL; Wang W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 54(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25675923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic effects of a 13q31.1 microdeletion detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
    Jia Y; Zhao H; Shi D; Peng W; Xie L; Wang W; Jiang F; Zhang H; Wang X
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(10):7003-11. PubMed ID: 25400788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Karyotype versus genomic hybridization for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities: a metaanalysis.
    Saldarriaga W; García-Perdomo HA; Arango-Pineda J; Fonseca J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):330.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25305409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-invasive prenatal screening versus prenatal diagnosis by array comparative genomic hybridization: a comparative retrospective study.
    Sotiriadis A; Papoulidis I; Siomou E; Papageorgiou E; Eleftheriades M; Papadopoulos V; Alexiou M; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2017 Jun; 37(6):583-592. PubMed ID: 28406537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal chromosomal microarray testing of fetuses with ultrasound structural anomalies: A prospective cohort study of over 1000 consecutive cases.
    Chong HP; Hamilton S; Mone F; Cheung KW; Togneri FS; Morris RK; Quinlan-Jones E; Williams D; Allen S; McMullan DJ; Kilby MD
    Prenat Diagn; 2019 Nov; 39(12):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 31393021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.