These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26289927)

  • 1. Routine use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as standard approach for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Clinical experience of 1763 prenatal cases.
    Papoulidis I; Sotiriadis A; Siomou E; Papageorgiou E; Eleftheriades M; Papadopoulos V; Oikonomidou E; Orru S; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2015 Dec; 35(13):1269-77. PubMed ID: 26289927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.
    Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases.
    Scott F; Murphy K; Carey L; Greville W; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 23401365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal setting.
    Lovrecic L; Remec ZI; Volk M; Rudolf G; Writzl K; Peterlin B
    BMC Med Genet; 2016 Nov; 17(1):81. PubMed ID: 27846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test.
    Carey L; Scott F; Murphy K; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Leigh D; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Prenat Diagn; 2014 May; 34(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 24453008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Resolution Level and Targeted Design in the Diagnostic Performance of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis.
    Papageorgiou E; Athanasiadis A; Fidani S; Papoulidis I; Manolakos E; Siomou E; Chatzakis C; Sotiriadis A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2023; 50(6):397-405. PubMed ID: 37549642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prenatal diagnosis: array comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with abnormal sonographic findings.
    Vestergaard EM; Christensen R; Petersen OB; Vogel I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Jul; 92(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 23590624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dilemmas in Prenatal Chromosomal Diagnosis Revealed Through a Single Center's 30 Years' Experience and 90,000 Cases.
    Konialis C; Pangalos C
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2015; 38(3):218-32. PubMed ID: 25659342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal microarray comparative genomic hybridization: Experience from the two first years of activity at the Lyon university-hospital.
    Pons L; Till M; Alix E; Abel C; Boggio D; Bordes A; Caloone J; Raskin FC; Chatron N; Cordier MP; Fichez A; Labalme A; Lajeunesse C; Liaras É; Massoud M; Miribel J; Ollagnon E; Schluth-Bolard C; Vichier-Cerf A; Edery P; Attia J; Huissoud C; Rudigoz RC; Massardier J; Gaucherand P; Sanlaville D
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 46(3):275-283. PubMed ID: 28403926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
    Rosenfeld JA; Tucker ME; Escobar LF; Neill NJ; Torchia BS; McDaniel LD; Schultz RA; Chong K; Chitayat D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25846569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotype.
    Leung TY; Vogel I; Lau TK; Chong W; Hyett JA; Petersen OB; Choy KW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 38(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 21400624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with congenital heart disease.
    Yan Y; Wu Q; Zhang L; Wang X; Dan S; Deng D; Sun L; Yao L; Ma Y; Wang L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24323407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Contribution of array CGH in the management of fetal nuchal translucency].
    Beal J; Jedraszak G; Saliou AH; Copin H; Sergent F; Gondry J; Merviel P; Muszynski C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Feb; 48(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 31634590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) Results among Patients Referred to Invasive Prenatal Testing after First-Trimester Screening: A Comprehensive Cohort Study.
    Wójtowicz A; Kowalczyk K; Szewczyk K; Madetko-Talowska A; Wójtowicz W; Huras H; Bik-Multanowski M; Beata N
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Sep; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 39410589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenatal diagnosis using array-CGH: a French experience.
    Rooryck C; Toutain J; Cailley D; Bouron J; Horovitz J; Lacombe D; Arveiler B; Saura R
    Eur J Med Genet; 2013 Jul; 56(7):341-5. PubMed ID: 23454632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jansen FA; Blumenfeld YJ; Fisher A; Cobben JM; Odibo AO; Borrell A; Haak MC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 25319878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal diagnosis and array comparative genomic hybridization characterization of trisomy 21 in a fetus associated with right congenital diaphragmatic hernia and a review of the literature of chromosomal abnormalities associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
    Chen CP; Wang YL; Chern SR; Liu YP; Peng CR; Kuo YL; Wu PS; Chen WL; Wang W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 54(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25675923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic effects of a 13q31.1 microdeletion detected by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
    Jia Y; Zhao H; Shi D; Peng W; Xie L; Wang W; Jiang F; Zhang H; Wang X
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(10):7003-11. PubMed ID: 25400788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Karyotype versus genomic hybridization for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities: a metaanalysis.
    Saldarriaga W; García-Perdomo HA; Arango-Pineda J; Fonseca J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):330.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25305409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-invasive prenatal screening versus prenatal diagnosis by array comparative genomic hybridization: a comparative retrospective study.
    Sotiriadis A; Papoulidis I; Siomou E; Papageorgiou E; Eleftheriades M; Papadopoulos V; Alexiou M; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2017 Jun; 37(6):583-592. PubMed ID: 28406537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.