These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26290170)

  • 1. Effects of coordinate-system construction methods on postoperative computed tomography evaluation of implant orientation after total hip arthroplasty.
    Kyo T; Nakahara I; Kuroda Y; Miki H
    Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 26290170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study.
    Nodzo SR; Chang CC; Carroll KM; Barlow BT; Banks SA; Padgett DE; Mayman DJ; Jerabek SA
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct; 100-B(10):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 30295538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
    Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation: which factors influence resultant cup orientation?
    Grammatopoulos G; Pandit HG; da Assunção R; McLardy-Smith P; De Smet KA; Gill HS; Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1290-7. PubMed ID: 25274911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.
    Takada R; Jinno T; Miyatake K; Hirao M; Yagishita K; Yoshii T; Okawa A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):915-922. PubMed ID: 31204181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Planning-Assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Sariali E; Boukhelifa N; Catonne Y; Pascal Moussellard H
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 26791031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of computed tomography-based three-dimensional surgical preoperative planning software in total hip arthroplasty with developmental dysplasia of the hip.
    Inoue D; Kabata T; Maeda T; Kajino Y; Fujita K; Hasegawa K; Yamamoto T; Tsuchiya H
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 25623254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation.
    Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative planning for implant placement with consideration of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty: postoperative efficacy evaluation.
    Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Suzuki H; Ike H; Kubota S; Saito T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jul; 17():280. PubMed ID: 27412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
    Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?
    Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating.
    Sariali E; Mauprivez R; Khiami F; Pascal-Mousselard H; Catonné Y
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Apr; 98(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 22381566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.
    Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [CT-free image guided acetabulum navigation in clinical routine].
    Von Recum J; Wendl K; Korber J; Wentzensen A; Grützner PA
    Unfallchirurg; 2003 Nov; 106(11):929-34. PubMed ID: 14634736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching.
    Blendea S; Eckman K; Jaramaz B; Levison TJ; Digioia AM
    Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 16199380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study.
    Worlicek M; Weber M; Craiovan B; Wörner M; Völlner F; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17():399. PubMed ID: 27646313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy.
    Kitada M; Nakamura N; Iwana D; Kakimoto A; Nishii T; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):674-9. PubMed ID: 20870379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Computer-assisted surgery for acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: comparative prospective randomized study].
    Parratte S; Argenson JN; Flecher X; Aubaniac JM
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 17534206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors related to disagreement in implant size between preoperative CT-based planning and the actual implants used intraoperatively for total hip arthroplasty.
    Ogawa T; Takao M; Sakai T; Sugano N
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Apr; 13(4):551-562. PubMed ID: 29236207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.