BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26290231)

  • 1. Cortical Coupling Reflects Bayesian Belief Updating in the Deployment of Spatial Attention.
    Vossel S; Mathys C; Stephan KE; Friston KJ
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(33):11532-42. PubMed ID: 26290231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deconstructing the architecture of dorsal and ventral attention systems with dynamic causal modeling.
    Vossel S; Weidner R; Driver J; Friston KJ; Fink GR
    J Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 32(31):10637-48. PubMed ID: 22855813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial Attention, Motor Intention, and Bayesian Cue Predictability in the Human Brain.
    Kuhns AB; Dombert PL; Mengotti P; Fink GR; Vossel S
    J Neurosci; 2017 May; 37(21):5334-5344. PubMed ID: 28450541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cholinergic stimulation enhances Bayesian belief updating in the deployment of spatial attention.
    Vossel S; Bauer M; Mathys C; Adams RA; Dolan RJ; Stephan KE; Friston KJ
    J Neurosci; 2014 Nov; 34(47):15735-42. PubMed ID: 25411501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.
    Vossel S; Mathys C; Daunizeau J; Bauer M; Driver J; Friston KJ; Stephan KE
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jun; 24(6):1436-50. PubMed ID: 23322402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional mechanisms of probabilistic inference in feature- and space-based attentional systems.
    Dombert PL; Kuhns A; Mengotti P; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():553-564. PubMed ID: 27523448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective connectivity during feature-based attentional capture: evidence against the attentional reorienting hypothesis of TPJ.
    DiQuattro NE; Sawaki R; Geng JJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3131-41. PubMed ID: 23825319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alpha oscillations encode Bayesian belief updating underlying attentional allocation in dynamic environments.
    Li S; Seger CA; Zhang J; Liu M; Dong W; Liu W; Chen Q
    Neuroimage; 2023 Dec; 284():120464. PubMed ID: 37984781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resting-state Functional Connectivity of the Right Temporoparietal Junction Relates to Belief Updating and Reorienting during Spatial Attention.
    Käsbauer AS; Mengotti P; Fink GR; Vossel S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1130-1141. PubMed ID: 32027583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent TMS-fMRI Reveals Interactions between Dorsal and Ventral Attentional Systems.
    Leitão J; Thielscher A; Tünnerhoff J; Noppeney U
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(32):11445-57. PubMed ID: 26269649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined TMS-fMRI reveals behavior-dependent network effects of right temporoparietal junction neurostimulation in an attentional belief updating task.
    Mengotti P; Käsbauer AS; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Oct; 32(21):4698-4714. PubMed ID: 35088068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is "odd" in Posner's location-cueing paradigm? Neural responses to unexpected location and feature changes compared.
    Vossel S; Weidner R; Thiel CM; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18476756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related changes in Bayesian belief updating during attentional deployment and motor intention.
    Mengotti P; Kuhns AB; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1387-1399. PubMed ID: 30806810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements.
    Crawford TJ; Muller HJ
    Vision Res; 1992 Feb; 32(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 1574846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks.
    DiQuattro NE; Geng JJ
    J Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 31(49):18026-35. PubMed ID: 22159116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex.
    Vossel S; Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16846742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction of stimulus-driven reorienting and expectation in ventral and dorsal frontoparietal and basal ganglia-cortical networks.
    Shulman GL; Astafiev SV; Franke D; Pope DL; Snyder AZ; McAvoy MP; Corbetta M
    J Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 29(14):4392-407. PubMed ID: 19357267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Response of the Left Ventral Attentional System to Invalid Targets and its Implication for the Spatial Neglect Syndrome: a Multivariate fMRI Investigation.
    Silvetti M; Lasaponara S; Lecce F; Dragone A; Macaluso E; Doricchi F
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4551-4562. PubMed ID: 26405052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.