112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26290362)
1. Counselling is difficult when outcomes are associated with mode of delivery and not with the plan for mode of delivery.
Salvesen K
BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1663. PubMed ID: 26290362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial: Counselling is difficult when outcomes are associated with mode of delivery and not the plan of mode of delivery.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Ross S; Joseph KS; Ohlsson A; Asztalos E; Willan AR; Allen AC; Armson BA; Gafni A; Mangoff K; Sanchez JJ; Barrett JF;
BJOG; 2016 Mar; 123(4):644. PubMed ID: 26914900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Author's Reply re: Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial.
Salvesen K
BJOG; 2016 Mar; 123(4):644-5. PubMed ID: 26914899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Ross S; Joseph KS; Ohlsson A; Asztalos EV; Willan AR; Allen AC; Armson BA; Gafni A; Mangoff K; Sanchez JJ; Barrett JF;
BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1653-62. PubMed ID: 26328526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view.
Vercellini P; Fumagalli M; Consonni D; de Braud L; Barbara G; Iurlaro E; Mosca F; Fedele L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Nov; 94(11):1235-44. PubMed ID: 26248808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?
Drassinower D; Timofeev J; Huang CC; Landy HJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):160.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24534184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Childbirth in Brazil: challenging an interventionist paradigm.
Declercq E
Birth; 2015 Mar; 42(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 25676791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks.
Glavind J; Uldbjerg N
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 27(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 25689238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevention of the first cesarean delivery.
Spong CY
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2015 Jun; 42(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 26002173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.
Todumrong N; Somprasit C; Tanprasertkul C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S37-41. PubMed ID: 29916674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Personal birth preferences and actual mode of delivery outcomes of obstetricians and gynaecologists in South West England; with comparison to regional and national birth statistics.
Lightly K; Shaw E; Dailami N; Bisson D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():95-8. PubMed ID: 25129154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal attachment and breastfeeding behaviors according to type of delivery in the immediate postpartum period.
Cetisli NE; Arkan G; Top ED
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2018 Feb; 64(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 29641664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrapartum interventions and breastfeeding duration.
Wallis J
Midwives; 2013; 16(3):35. PubMed ID: 24868831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Association Between Obstetric Mode of Delivery and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Population-Based Sibling Design Study.
Curran EA; Dalman C; Kearney PM; Kenny LC; Cryan JF; Dinan TG; Khashan AS
JAMA Psychiatry; 2015 Sep; 72(9):935-42. PubMed ID: 26107922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elective Caesarean section on maternal request in Germany: factors affecting decision making concerning mode of delivery.
Stützer PP; Berlit S; Lis S; Schmahl C; Sütterlin M; Tuschy B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1151-1156. PubMed ID: 28324224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Time to consider the risks of caesarean delivery for long term child health.
Blustein J; Liu J
BMJ; 2015 Jun; 350():h2410. PubMed ID: 26063685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa.
Shah A; Fawole B; M'imunya JM; Amokrane F; Nafiou I; Wolomby JJ; Mugerwa K; Neves I; Nguti R; Kublickas M; Mathai M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Dec; 107(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 19782977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time to subsequent live birth according to mode of delivery in the first birth.
O'Neill SM; Khashan AS; Kenny LC; Kearney PM; Mortensen PB; Greene RA; Agerbo E; Uldbjerg N; Henriksen TB
BJOG; 2015 Aug; 122(9):1207-15. PubMed ID: 25825045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of introducing specific measures to reduce the frequency of cesarean delivery for non-obstetric indications.
Psenkova P; Bucko M; Braticak M; Baneszova R; Zahumensky J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 142(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 29577273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of obstetric mode of delivery on childhood behavior.
Al Khalaf SY; O'Neill SM; O'Keeffe LM; Henriksen TB; Kenny LC; Cryan JF; Khashan AS
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):1557-67. PubMed ID: 25868660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
