146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26290417)
1. A comparison of registration errors with imageless computer navigation during MIS total knee arthroplasty versus standard incision total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
Davis ET; Pagkalos J; Gallie PA; Macgroarty K; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 26290417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Defining the errors in the registration process during imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.
Davis ET; Pagkalos J; Gallie PA; Macgroarty K; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):698-701. PubMed ID: 23972297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 10-Year patient satisfaction compared between computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty.
Khuangsirikul S; Lekkreusuwan K; Chotanaphuti T
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2016 Dec; 21(1):172-175. PubMed ID: 27973967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial.
Lüring C; Beckmann J; Haiböck P; Perlick L; Grifka J; Tingart M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Oct; 16(10):928-34. PubMed ID: 18633597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study.
Khakha RS; Chowdhry M; Norris M; Kheiran A; Patel N; Chauhan SK
Knee; 2014 Oct; 21(5):944-8. PubMed ID: 25086899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of blood loss in minimally invasive surgery with and without electromagnetic computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Junsee D; Tanavalee A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S27-32. PubMed ID: 20120662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. Surgical technique.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():116-30. PubMed ID: 19255204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Conventional Instrumentation for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alcelik IA; Blomfield MI; Diana G; Gibbon AJ; Carrington N; Burr S
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Feb; 31(2):410-8. PubMed ID: 26507525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Biasca N; Schneider TO; Bungartz M
Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 40(4):537-63, x. PubMed ID: 19773060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation.
Tria AJ
Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 15062708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Is computer navigation a useful tool in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A pilot cadaver study].
Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Schlegel U; Schneider M; Clauss M; Goodfellow JW; Murray DW; Breusch SJ
Orthopade; 2005 Nov; 34(11):1094, 1096-102. PubMed ID: 16237558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
Cheng T; Zhang G; Zhang X
J Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 171(2):590-600. PubMed ID: 21176919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without a navigation system.
Seon JK; Song EK; Park SJ; Yoon TR; Lee KB; Jung ST
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18534460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of three minimally invasive techniques for total knee replacement at two years.
Lin SY; Chen CH; Fu YC; Huang PJ; Lu CC; Su JY; Chang JK; Huang HT
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):906-10. PubMed ID: 23814241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolving role of navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Tria AJ
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Jul; 35(7 Suppl):18-22. PubMed ID: 16927649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraobserver errors in obtaining visually selected anatomic landmarks during registration process in nonimage-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric experiment.
Yau WP; Leung A; Chiu KY; Tang WM; Ng TP
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Aug; 20(5):591-601. PubMed ID: 16309994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical Navigation Improves the Precision and Accuracy of Tibial Component Alignment in Canine Total Knee Replacement.
Peters KM; Hutter E; Siston RA; Bertran J; Allen MJ
Vet Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 26731596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigation knee replacement.
Dattani R; Patnaik S; Kantak A; Tselentakis G
Int Orthop; 2009 Feb; 33(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 18958468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
