146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26290417)
21. Minimally invasive imageless computer-navigated knee surgery: initial results.
Chandrasekaran S; Molnar RB
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 18358385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually selected anatomical landmarks during registration process in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Yau WP; Leung A; Liu KG; Yan CH; Wong LL; Chiu KY
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1150-61. PubMed ID: 18078884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Scientific evidence supporting computer-assisted surgery and minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty.
Ulrich SD; Mont MA; Bonutti PM; Seyler TM; Marker DR; Jones LC
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Jul; 4(4):497-505. PubMed ID: 17605685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results].
Hart R; Janecek M; Cizmár I; Stipcák V; Kucera B; Filan P
Orthopade; 2006 May; 35(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 16552520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Navigation-assisted minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra-articular femoral deformity.
Kim KI; Ramteke AA; Bae DK
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):658.e17-22. PubMed ID: 19493655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
Bové JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty provides superior short term functional outcomes: a meta-analysis.
Rebal BA; Babatunde OM; Lee JH; Geller JA; Patrick DA; Macaulay W
J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):938-44. PubMed ID: 24140274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prospective non-randomized comparative clinical outcome of computer assisted total knee arthroplasty with and without a minimally invasive approach.
Leelasestaporn C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Sep; 94(9):1089-95. PubMed ID: 21970198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods.
Anderson KC; Buehler KC; Markel DC
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):132-8. PubMed ID: 16214014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty and navigation - a logical combination?].
Lüring C; Tingart M; Beckmann J; Perlick L; Grifka J
Orthopade; 2007 Dec; 36(12):1143-8. PubMed ID: 17972062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment.
Kim SJ; MacDonald M; Hernandez J; Wixson RL
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):123-31. PubMed ID: 16214013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Unicompartmental knee replacement: a comparison of four techniques combining less invasive approach and navigation.
Jenny JY
Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10 Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 19298033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is a minimally invasive approach superior to a conventional approach for total knee arthroplasty? Early outcome and 2- to 4-year follow-up.
Watanabe T; Muneta T; Ishizuki M
J Orthop Sci; 2009 Sep; 14(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 19802671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-assisted navigation for the assessment of fixed flexion in knee arthroplasty.
Gallie PA; Davis ET; Macgroarty K; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
Can J Surg; 2010 Feb; 53(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20100412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computer-assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal.
Venkatesan M; Mahadevan D; Ashford RU
J Knee Surg; 2013 Oct; 26(5):357-61. PubMed ID: 23512544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An additional reference axis improves femoral rotation alignment in image-free computer navigation assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Inui H; Taketomi S; Nakamura K; Sanada T; Tanaka S; Nakagawa T
J Arthroplasty; 2013 May; 28(5):766-71. PubMed ID: 23499408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The current status of computer-assisted high tibial osteotomy, unicompartmental knee replacement, and revision total knee replacement.
Jenny JY
Instr Course Lect; 2008; 57():721-6. PubMed ID: 18399619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2 year follow up.
Tasker A; Hassaballa M; Murray J; Lancaster S; Artz N; Harries W; Porteous A
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 23972565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Kim TK; Chang CB; Kang YG; Chung BJ; Cho HJ; Seong SC
Knee; 2010 Jan; 17(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 19581096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
