These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26291383)

  • 1. How does visual manipulation affect obstacle avoidance strategies used by athletes?
    Bijman MP; Fisher JJ; Vallis LA
    J Sports Sci; 2016; 34(10):915-22. PubMed ID: 26291383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment.
    Rietdyk S; Rhea CK
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 169(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 16421728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstacle avoidance during locomotion using haptic information in normally sighted humans.
    Patla AE; Davies TC; Niechwiej E
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 155(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 14770274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of single and double obstacle avoidance strategies: a comparison between adults and children.
    Berard JR; Vallis LA
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 175(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 16761138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Manipulating sensory information: obstacle crossing strategies between typically developing children and young adults.
    Rapos V; Cinelli M
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):513-523. PubMed ID: 31960105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of object height and visual information on the control of obstacle crossing during locomotion in healthy older adults.
    Kunimune S; Okada S
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jun; 55():126-130. PubMed ID: 28437760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual exteroceptive information provided during obstacle crossing did not modify the lower limb trajectory.
    Rhea CK; Rietdyk S
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 418(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 17382468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of vision and its age-related changes to postural stability in obstacle crossing during locomotion.
    Kunimune S; Okada S
    Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():284-288. PubMed ID: 30925352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related changes in avoidance strategies when negotiating single and multiple obstacles.
    Lowrey CR; Watson A; Vallis LA
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 182(3):289-99. PubMed ID: 17551718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion.
    Mohagheghi AA; Moraes R; Patla AE
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 14770275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contribution of vision, proprioception, and efference copy in storing a neural representation for guiding trail leg trajectory over an obstacle.
    Lajoie K; Bloomfield LW; Nelson FJ; Suh JJ; Marigold DS
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(8):2283-93. PubMed ID: 22298832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase.
    Patla AE; Greig M
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr 10-17; 397(1-2):110-4. PubMed ID: 16413969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obstacle crossing during locomotion: visual exproprioceptive information is used in an online mode to update foot placement before the obstacle but not swing trajectory over it.
    Timmis MA; Buckley JG
    Gait Posture; 2012 May; 36(1):160-2. PubMed ID: 22424759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensorimotor integration of vision and proprioception for obstacle crossing in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Malik RN; Cote R; Lam T
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 27733593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Keep looking ahead? Re-direction of visual fixation does not always occur during an unpredictable obstacle avoidance task.
    Marigold DS; Weerdesteyn V; Patla AE; Duysens J
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 16819646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of aging on whole body and segmental control while obstacle crossing under impaired sensory conditions.
    Novak AC; Deshpande N
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Jun; 35():121-30. PubMed ID: 24746603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do characteristics of a stationary obstacle lead to adjustments in obstacle stepping strategies?
    Worden TA; De Jong AF; Vallis LA
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():38-41. PubMed ID: 26669949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory-guided obstacle crossing: more failures were observed for the trail limb versus lead limb.
    Heijnen MJ; Romine NL; Stumpf DM; Rietdyk S
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jul; 232(7):2131-42. PubMed ID: 24838551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failures in adaptive locomotion: trial-and-error exploration to determine adequate foot elevation over obstacles.
    Heijnen MJH; Rietdyk S
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):187-194. PubMed ID: 29119208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related kinematic changes in late visual-cueing during obstacle circumvention.
    Paquette MR; Vallis LA
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 203(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 20467732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.