These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26291898)

  • 21. Psychometric evaluation of the ostomy complication severity index.
    Pittman J; Bakas T; Ellett M; Sloan R; Rawl SM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 24418964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the effect of preoperative stoma site marking on stomal and peristomal complications.
    Baykara ZG; Demir SG; Karadag A; Harputlu D; Kahraman A; Karadag S; Hin AO; Togluk E; Altinsoy M; Erdem S; Cihan R
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2014 May; 60(5):16-26. PubMed ID: 24807019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SACS Evolution: a peristomal health tool for the prevention of peristomal skin disorders.
    Villa G; Crafa A; Denti F; Grilli M; Passafiume S; Sarritzu G; Spena PR; Maculotti D
    Minerva Surg; 2021 Oct; 76(5):423-428. PubMed ID: 34814654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of a mobile patient education application on adjustment to stoma and development of peristomal skin lesions: a quasi-experimental study.
    Yiğitoğlu ET; Şendir M
    Wound Manag Prev; 2021 Dec; 67(12):30-40. PubMed ID: 35030542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure ulcer prevention knowledge assessment instrument.
    Tulek Z; Polat C; Ozkan I; Theofanidis D; Togrol RE
    J Tissue Viability; 2016 Nov; 25(4):201-208. PubMed ID: 27671870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Psychometric validation of the Ostomy Skin Tool 2.0.
    Jemec G; Herschend NO; Hansen HD; Findley A; Williams A; Sully K; Karlsmark T; Størling Z
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16685. PubMed ID: 38130931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of standardized peristomal skin care and crusting technique in prevention of peristomal skin problems in ostomy patients.
    Park S; Lee YJ; Oh DN; Kim J
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2011 Dec; 41(6):814-20. PubMed ID: 22310866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Ostomy Skin Tool 2.0: a new instrument for assessing peristomal skin changes.
    Martins L; Down G; Andersen BD; Nielsen LF; Hansen AS; Herschend NO; Størling Z
    Br J Nurs; 2022 Apr; 31(8):442-450. PubMed ID: 35439075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability and validity of a Turkish language version of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool.
    Karahan A; Toruner EK; Ceylan A; Abbasoglu A; Tekindal A; Buyukgonenc L
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 24988512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a New Elastic Ostomy Appliance to Decrease Skin Complications: Results of a Pilot Study.
    Bloemen A; Aarts F; Bouvy N; Nijhuis P
    Wound Manag Prev; 2020 May; 66(5):30-36. PubMed ID: 32401732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peristomal skin care and the use of accessories to promote skin health.
    Burch J
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Apr 14-27; 20(7):S4, S6, S8 passim. PubMed ID: 21537268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Untreated peristomal skin complications among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies.
    McMullen CK; Wasserman J; Altschuler A; Grant ML; Hornbrook MC; Liljestrand P; Briggs C; Krouse RS
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(6):644-50. PubMed ID: 22119975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical and Economic Burden of Peristomal Skin Complications in Patients With Recent Ostomies.
    Taneja C; Netsch D; Rolstad BS; Inglese G; Lamerato L; Oster G
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(4):350-357. PubMed ID: 28574928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peristomal skin disorders in patients with intestinal and urinary ostomies: influence of adhesive forces of various hydrocolloid wafer skin barriers.
    Omura Y; Yamabe M; Anazawa S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2010; 37(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 20436373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors predictive of optimal peristomal skin status in patients with an ostomy: a secondary analysis.
    González ER; Zurita CDP; Caballero GA; Rodríguez AH; Rodríguez EZ; Blázquez EG
    Br J Community Nurs; 2021 Dec; 26(Sup12):S24-S34. PubMed ID: 34881649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Burden of Peristomal Skin Complications on an Ostomy Population as Assessed by Health Utility and the Physical Component Summary of the SF-36v2
    Nichols TR; Inglese GW
    Value Health; 2018 Jan; 21(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 29304945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating skin care problems in people with stomas.
    Williams J; Gwillam B; Sutherland N; Matten J; Hemmingway J; Ilsey H; Somerville M; Vujnovich A; Day S; Redmond C; Cowin C; Fox K; Parker T
    Br J Nurs; 2010 Sep 23-Oct 13; 19(17):S6-S15. PubMed ID: 20871505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire in patients with leukemia.
    Biçici B; Güneş UY
    J Clin Nurs; 2012 Dec; 21(23-24):3328-34. PubMed ID: 22686194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. CE: Stoma and Peristomal Skin Care: A Clinical Review.
    Stelton S
    Am J Nurs; 2019 Jun; 119(6):38-45. PubMed ID: 31135430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version in individuals with cancer.
    Cetin AA; Bektas H; Ozdogan M
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Feb; 20():1-9. PubMed ID: 25937491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.